Literature DB >> 30361116

Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Michael C Brooks1, A Lynn Wood2, Jaehyun Cho3, Christine A P Williams4, William Brandon4, Michael D Annable3.   

Abstract

Source strength functions (SSF), defined as contaminant mass discharge or flux-averaged concentration from dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source zones as a function of time, provide a quantitative model of DNAPL source-zone behavior. Such information is useful for calibration of screening-level models to assist with site management decisions. We investigate the use of historic data collected during long-term monitoring (LTM) activities at a site in Rhode Island to predict the SSF based on temporal mass discharge measurements at a fixed location, as well as SSF estimation using mass discharge measurements at a fixed time from three spatially distributed control planes. Mass discharge based on LTM data decreased from ~300 g/day in 1996 to ~70 g/day in 2012 at a control plane downgradient of the suspected DNAPL source zone, and indicates an overall decline of ~80% in 16 years. These measurements were compared to current mass discharge measurements across three spatially distributed control planes. Results indicate that mass discharge increased in the downgradient direction, and was ~6 g/day, ~37 g/day, and ~400 g/day at near, intermediate, and far distances from the suspected source zone, respectively. This behavior was expected given the decreasing trend observed in the LTM data at a fixed location. These two data sets were compared using travel time as a means to plot the data sets on a common axis. The similarity between the two data sets gives greater confidence to the use of this combined data set for site-specific SSF estimation relative to either the sole use of LTM or spatially distributed data sets. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:  Long-term monitoring data; Mass discharge; Mass flux; Passive flux meters; Source strength function; Source zone characterization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361116      PMCID: PMC7390023          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2018.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  26 in total

1.  Simple screening models of NAPL dissolution in the subsurface.

Authors:  Jianting Zhu; Jonathan F Sykes
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 2.  DNAPL source depletion: linking architecture and flux response.

Authors:  Adrian D Fure; James W Jawitz; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution.

Authors:  Ronald W Falta; Nandita Basu; P Suresh Rao
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  The uncertainty of mass discharge measurements using pumping methods under simplified conditions.

Authors:  Xiaosong Chen; Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.188

5.  Application of a lumped-process mathematical model to dissolution of non-uniformly distributed immiscible liquid in heterogeneous porous media.

Authors:  J C Marble; E L DiFilippo; Z Zhang; G R Tick; M L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Mass discharge assessment at a brominated DNAPL site: Effects of known DNAPL source mass removal.

Authors:  C D Johnston; G B Davis; T P Bastow; R J Woodbury; P S C Rao; M D Annable; S Rhodes
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Enhanced aqueous dissolution of a DNAPL source to characterize the source strength function.

Authors:  Fang Wang; Michael D Annable; Charles E Schaefer; Timothy D Ault; Jaehyun Cho; James W Jawitz
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Assessment of a simple function to evaluate the relationship between mass flux reduction and mass removal for organic-liquid contaminated source zones.

Authors:  Erica L DiFilippo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  Mass discharge in a tracer plume: evaluation of the Theissen Polygon Method.

Authors:  Douglas M Mackay; Murray D Einarson; Phil M Kaiser; Mamie Nozawa-Inoue; Sham Goyal; Irina Chakraborty; Ehsan Rasa; Kate M Scow
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.671

10.  Flux-based assessment at a manufacturing site contaminated with trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Nandita B Basu; P S C Rao; Irene C Poyer; M D Annable; K Hatfield
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.188

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.