Literature DB >> 1839759

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of teicoplanin in healthy volunteers after single increasing doses.

A Del Favero1, L Patoia, R Rosina, G Buniva, A Danese, A Bernareggi, E Molini, L Cavenaghi.   

Abstract

In this double-blind, randomized study, five healthy subjects per group received doses of 15, 20, or 25 mg of teicoplanin per kg of body weight, and one subject per group received a 0.9% NaCl placebo as single intravenous infusion over 30 min. Serial blood samples and urine were collected for 13 days postadministration, and concentrations of teicoplanin were determined by microbiological assay. The pharmacokinetic data were analyzed by noncompartmental and compartmental analyses. Laboratory safety tests, audiometry, and serum creatinine clearance measurements were done prior to day 1 and on days 2 and 14. In the three groups, peak levels at the end of the infusion averaged 194, 197, and 253 mg/liter, respectively. Mean concentrations in plasma 24 h after the administration were 10.5, 13.6, and 19.8 mg/liter, respectively. Mean values of volume of distribution at steady state were 0.80, 0.87, and 0.87 liters/kg, respectively. Terminal half-lives averaged 88, 83, and 92 h. Mean total clearance values were 10.9, 11.0, and 11.3 mg/h/kg, respectively, with renal clearance accounting for 75, 81, and 78%, respectively, of the total. The 13-day cumulative mean urinary recovery ranged from 71 to 78% of the dose within the groups. The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin appears to be linear in the range of administered doses. Teicoplanin was generally well tolerated. Side effects, appearing in five subjects, were represented by fevers, chills, and skin reactions; these adverse reactions were mild, but one episode of rash necessitated the interruption of infusion, and one episode of chills necessitated treatment with corticosteroids. There was no indication of drug-related modifications of laboratory test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1839759      PMCID: PMC245429          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.35.12.2551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of 14C-teicoplanin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  G Buniva; A Del Favero; A Bernareggi; L Patoia; R Palumbo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  NONLIN84/PCNONLIN: software for the statistical analysis of nonlinear models.

Authors:  D L Weiner
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-10

3.  Statistical estimations in pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  H G Boxenbaum; S Riegelman; R M Elashoff
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1974-04

4.  Comparison of the solid phase enzyme receptor assay (SPERA) and the microbiological assay for teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Cavenaghi; A Corti; G Cassani
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  A multicentre open clinical trial of teicoplanin in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  P Lewis; J J Garaud; F Parenti
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  S Ripa; L Ferrante; F Mignini; E Falcioni
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.544

7.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-04

8.  Tissue distribution and elimination of 14C-aminoglutethimide in the mouse.

Authors:  P D Dalrymple; P J Nicholls
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

9.  Randomised, controlled trial of the comparative efficacy, auditory toxicity, and nephrotoxicity of tobramycin and netilmicin.

Authors:  A M Lerner; M P Reyes; L A Cone; D C Blair; W Jansen; G E Wright; R R Lorber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Teicoplanin, its pharmacokinetics, blister and peritoneal fluid penetration.

Authors:  R Wise; I A Donovan; C A McNulty; R Waldron; J M Andrews
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.926

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults.

Authors:  Bernard Rouveix; François Jehl; Henri Drugeon; Ivan Brumpt; Evelyne Caulin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Penetration of teicoplanin into heart valves and subcutaneous and muscle tissues of patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Authors:  U K Frank; E Schmidt-Eisenlohr; D Mlangeni; M Schindler; A Hoh; F Beyersdorf; F D Daschner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Daptomycin or teicoplanin in combination with gentamicin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  F Caron; M D Kitzis; L Gutmann; A C Cremieux; B Maziere; J M Vallois; A Saleh-Mghir; J F Lemeland; C Carbon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Charbonneau; I Harding; J J Garaud; J Aubertin; F Brunet; Y Domart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Teicoplanin physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling offers a quantitative assessment of a theoretical influence of serum albumin and renal function on its disposition.

Authors:  Chie Emoto; Trevor N Johnson; Takaaki Yamada; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Tsuyoshi Fukuda
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.953

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.