Literature DB >> 10155323

Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

C M Spencer1, H M Bryson.   

Abstract

Teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic, is active against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci. It has demonstrated similar efficacy to vancomycin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in febrile patients with neutropenia; fewer comparative data are available in patients with other infection types. Compared with vancomycin, teicoplanin is associated with less nephrotoxicity, appears to cause fewer anaphylactoid reactions, requires less monitoring and is more convenient to administer (once daily by intravenous bolus or intramuscular injection vs 2 to 4 times daily by intravenous infusion). Two European cost-minimisation studies have demonstrated that while the acquisition cost per dose of teicoplanin was approximately twice that of vancomycin, the cost of 2 weeks' therapy with either agent was similar (difference of 1 to 2%). However, in order to fully explore potential differences between these agents, a full economic analysis which considers all treatment-related costs is needed. Home therapy of Gram-positive infections, a setting in which teicoplanin may be preferred over vancomycin because of its tolerability profile and ease of administration, is particularly worthy of future economic study. Thus, there are a number of areas needing further study before the optimum formulary positioning of teicoplanin can be definitely stated. Nevertheless, present evidence suggests that teicoplanin is likely to have pharmacoeconomic advantages over vancomycin in at least some situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 10155323     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199507040-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  110 in total

1.  Comparative activity of glycopeptide antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococci embedded in fibrin clots.

Authors:  R Cunningham; J Cheesbrough
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of glycopeptide resistance determinants in gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  S Dutka-Malen; R Leclercq; V Coutant; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Oral ciprofloxacin: a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Anti-staphylococcal activity of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and other antimicrobial agents: the significance of methicillin resistance.

Authors:  V E Del Bene; J F John; J A Twitty; J W Lewis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Dosage recommendations for teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson; R N Grüneberg; H Neu
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Why monitor peak vancomycin concentrations?

Authors:  N J Saunders
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Spanish experience with teicoplanin.

Authors:  M Fernández-Guerrero; M Gobernado; J Ariza; A Williams
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1990

8.  Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection.

Authors:  D R Schaberg; D H Culver; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe.

Authors:  A Voss; D Milatovic; C Wallrauch-Schwarz; V T Rosdahl; I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  In vitro activity of the new glycopeptide decaplanin.

Authors:  H C Neu; N X Chin; W W Niu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  5 in total

1.  Vancomycin vs teicoplanin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a Turkish University Hospital.

Authors:  Aylin Acar Sancar; Selen Yegenoglu; Robin de Vries; Maarten J Postma; Nimet Simsek; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Serhat Unal
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-09-21

Review 2.  Rational prescribing of antibacterials in hospitalised children.

Authors:  J E Hoppe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost analysis of 2 empiric antibacterial regimens containing glycopeptides for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukaemia.

Authors:  G Bucaneve; F Menichetti; A Del Favero
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations.

Authors:  Shamez Ladhani; Mehdi Garbash
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Nephrotoxicity of Teicoplanin Therapy in Chinese Children: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dan Sun; Tao Zhang; Jie Mi; Yuzhu Dong; Yang Liu; Ying Zhang; Di Zhang; Taotao Wang; Hua Cheng; Yalin Dong
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.