Literature DB >> 2965133

A multicentre open clinical trial of teicoplanin in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

P Lewis1, J J Garaud, F Parenti.   

Abstract

A multicentre open trial of teicoplanin in 81 centres in nine European countries included 1431 cases: 531 female, 900 male; mean age 49.4 years, range 1-93 years. These were hospitalized patients most of whom had infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (816 isolates). Of a total of 1427 Gram-positive pathogens 280 (19.6%) were methicillin resistant. There were 536 skin and soft tissue infections, 263 septicaemias, 135 lower respiratory tract infections, 179 joint and bone infections and 83 endocarditides. More than a third of the infections were severe. Complicating medical factors were present in 69% of cases, including malignant disease in 14% and diabetes mellitus in 11%. Mean teicoplanin dose was 289 mg/day; mean duration of treatment was 14 days. A total of 471 patients received a high dose regimen, 400 mg teicoplanin daily for at least five days. Monotherapy with teicoplanin was used in 1037 cases and combination with other antibiotics in 394. Overall 91.7% of the 1333 evaluable cases were clinical cured or improved. The MIC of teicoplanin was less than or equal to 1 mg/l for 90% of Gram-positive isolates. Adverse events were reported in 189 cases (13.2%). The most common drug-related event was an allergic type skin reaction which occurred in 35 cases (2.4%). Transient hepatic dysfunction was reported in 28 patients (2.0%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2965133     DOI: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_a.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  27 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of teicoplanin.

Authors:  P Calain; F Waldvogel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Treatment failure with teicoplanin and response to oral antibiotic regimens.

Authors:  P H McWhinney
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Comparative Study of Teicoplanin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia.

Authors:  C Y Liu; W S Lee; C P Fung; N C Cheng; C L Liu; S P Yang; S L Chen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Antibiotics in neonatal infections: a review.

Authors:  V Fanos; A Dall'Agnola
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections.

Authors:  F de Lalla; A Tramarin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Glycopeptides and nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A W Chow; R M Azar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

Authors:  P Charbonneau; I Harding; J J Garaud; J Aubertin; F Brunet; Y Domart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Treatment of 112 bone and joint infections with teicoplanin.

Authors:  V Dacquet; F Biron; D Gontier; G Choquet-Kasylevsky; A Niwiczka; I Harding; C Atlani; D Peyramond
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.