Teicoplanin: a well-tolerated and easily administered alternative to vancomycin for gram-positive infections in intensive care patients.

A prospective, randomized multicentre study was conducted in order to evaluate the potentially superior tolerability profile of teicoplanin plus netilmicin compared with vancomycin plus netilmicin in patients in ICUs. We considered that these glycopeptides have been shown to have comparable efficacy and that comparative tolerability is of paramount importance, particularly in severely ill patients. A total of 56 patients were enrolled into the study (36 males and 20 females). Twenty-four patients were included in the teicoplanin plus netilmicin group (15 males, 9 females: mean age 56.8 years). The mean simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) was 9.4 (range 4-20). Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive vancomycin plus netilmicin (21 males, 11 females; mean age 56.4 years). The mean SAPS was 9.3 (range 2-16). Septicaemia was the most common infection (14 cases in each group). Most infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci. The mean daily doses were: for teicoplanin, 457 mg (6.7 mg/kg); for vancomycin, 1678 mg (24.4 mg/kg); and for netilmicin 263.3 mg (3.9 mg/kg) in the teicoplanin group and 248 mg (3.8 mg/kg) in the vancomycin group. The trough levels of teicoplanin in the serum remained mostly between 7 and 10 mg/l, while more fluctuation was seen in patients receiving vancomycin. The mean trough levels of netilmicin in the serum were 1.2 (SD 0.9) mg/l in the teicoplanin group, compared with 1.7 (SD 1.4) mg/l in the vancomycin group (NS: p > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes