Literature DB >> 18395705

Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements.

Anna Papafragou1, Justin Hulbert, John Trueswell.   

Abstract

Languages differ in how they encode motion. When describing bounded motion, English speakers typically use verbs that convey information about manner (e.g., slide, skip, walk) rather than path (e.g., approach, ascend), whereas Greek speakers do the opposite. We investigated whether this strong cross-language difference influences how people allocate attention during motion perception. We compared eye movements from Greek and English speakers as they viewed motion events while (a) preparing verbal descriptions or (b) memorizing the events. During the verbal description task, speakers' eyes rapidly focused on the event components typically encoded in their native language, generating significant cross-language differences even during the first second of motion onset. However, when freely inspecting ongoing events, as in the memorization task, people allocated attention similarly regardless of the language they speak. Differences between language groups arose only after the motion stopped, such that participants spontaneously studied those aspects of the scene that their language does not routinely encode in verbs. These findings offer a novel perspective on the relation between language and perceptual/cognitive processes. They indicate that attention allocation during event perception is not affected by the perceiver's native language; effects of language arise only when linguistic forms are recruited to achieve the task, such as when committing facts to memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18395705      PMCID: PMC2810627          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  19 in total

1.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Motion events in language and cognition.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Steven A Sloman; Barbara C Malt; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

4.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding.

Authors:  Z M Griffin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-11

5.  Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Can language restructure cognition? The case for space.

Authors:  Asifa Majid; Melissa Bowerman; Sotaro Kita; Daniel B M Haun; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production.

Authors:  A S Meyer; A M Sleiderink; W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-05

8.  What you see is what you need.

Authors:  Jochen Triesch; Dana H Ballard; Mary M Hayhoe; Brian T Sullivan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; I Sekerina; N M Hill; M L Logrip
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-07

10.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns.

Authors:  S Choi; M Bowerman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-12
View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French.

Authors:  Helen Engemann; Henriëtte Hendriks; Maya Hickmann; Efstathia Soroli; Coralie Vincent
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Carving the world for language: how neuroscientific research can enrich the study of first and second language learning.

Authors:  Nathan R George; Tilbe Göksun; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory.

Authors:  Caitlin M Fausey; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

5.  Does the Owl Fly out of the Tree or Does the Owl Exit the Tree Flying? How L2 Learners Overcome Their L1 Lexicalization Biases.

Authors:  Lulu Song; Rachel Pulverman; Christina Pepe; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2015-02-04

6.  Integrating mechanisms of visual guidance in naturalistic language production.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Frank Keller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-11-23

7.  The relation between event apprehension and utterance formulation in children: Evidence from linguistic omissions.

Authors:  Ann Bunger; John C Trueswell; Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-11-04

8.  Use of Speaker's Gaze and Syntax in Verb Learning.

Authors:  Rebecca Nappa; Allison Wessel; Katherine L McEldoon; Lila R Gleitman; John C Trueswell
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2009

9.  Early Verb Learning: How Do Children Learn How to Compare Events?

Authors:  Jane B Childers; Rebecca Parrish; Christina V Olson; Clare Burch; Gavin Fung; Kevin McIntyre
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-07-06

10.  Encoding of event roles from visual scenes is rapid, spontaneous, and interacts with higher-level visual processing.

Authors:  Alon Hafri; John C Trueswell; Brent Strickland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.