Literature DB >> 1790656

Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns.

S Choi1, M Bowerman.   

Abstract

English and Korean differ in how they lexicalize the components of motion events. English characteristically conflates Motion with Manner, Cause, or Deixis, and expresses Path separately. Korean, in contrast, conflates Motion with Path and elements of Figure and Ground in transitive clauses for caused Motion, but conflates motion with Deixis and spells out Path and Manner separately in intransitive clauses for spontaneous motion. Children learning English and Korean show sensitivity to language-specific patterns in the way they talk about motion from as early as 17-20 months. For example, learners of English quickly generalize their earliest spatial words--Path particles like up, down, and in--to both spontaneous and caused changes of location and, for up and down, to posture changes, while learners of Korean keep words for spontaneous and caused motion strictly separate and use different words for vertical changes of location and posture changes. These findings challenge the widespread view that children initially map spatial words directly to nonlinguistic spatial concepts, and suggest that they are influenced by the semantic organization of their language virtually from the beginning. We discuss how input and cognition may interact in the early phases of learning to talk about space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1790656     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90033-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  35 in total

1.  The role of language in memory for actions.

Authors:  Matthew Finkbeiner; Janet Nicol; Delia Greth; Kumiko Nakamura
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-09

2.  Who is crossing where? Infants' discrimination of figures and grounds in events.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Mutsumi Imai; Haruka Konishi; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-08-12

3.  On the universal structure of human lexical semantics.

Authors:  Hyejin Youn; Logan Sutton; Eric Smith; Cristopher Moore; Jon F Wilkins; Ian Maddieson; William Croft; Tanmoy Bhattacharya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes.

Authors:  Michele I Feist; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

5.  On the way to language: event segmentation in homesign and gesture.

Authors:  Asli Ozyürek; Reyhan Furman; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-03-20

Review 6.  Statistical evidence that a child can create a combinatorial linguistic system without external linguistic input: Implications for language evolution.

Authors:  Susan Goldin-Meadow; Charles Yang
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter?

Authors:  Shannon M Pruden; Susan C Levine; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-10-04

8.  Can English-learning toddlers acquire and generalize a novel spatial word?

Authors:  Marianella Casasola; Makeba Parramore Wilbourn; Sujin Yang
Journal:  First Lang       Date:  2006-01-01

9.  Twelve-Month-Old Infants' Encoding of Goal and Source Paths in Agentive and Non-Agentive Motion Events.

Authors:  Laura Lakusta; Susan Carey
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2015-04

10.  Do novel words facilitate 18-month-olds' spatial categorization?

Authors:  Marianella Casasola; Jui Bhagwat
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.