Literature DB >> 11672707

Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding.

Z M Griffin1.   

Abstract

Speakers produced the sentence frame The A and the B are above the C to describe three pictured objects while their eye movements were monitored. Object B or C varied in codability (the number of alternative names for it) and in the frequency of its dominant name. Codability is known to affect speed of word selection, and word frequency, speed to retrieve a word's pronunciation (phonological encoding). Speakers gazed longer at lower codability and lower frequency objects before naming them. However, the codability and frequency of B and C did not affect when speakers began naming A, even when utterances were perfectly fluent. The results indicate that speakers began "The A..." once they had a name prepared for A, before selecting names for B and C. Similar gaze patterns during less constrained scene description tasks in other studies suggest that speakers often incrementally select and phonologically encode nouns in fluent utterances.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11672707      PMCID: PMC5130081          DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00138-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  14 in total

1.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.

Authors:  M Smith; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

2.  Synchronizing visual and language processing: an effect of object name length on eye movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; G L Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-03

3.  What the eyes say about speaking.

Authors:  Z M Griffin; K Bock
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

4.  Meaning in visual search.

Authors:  M C Potter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cognitive components of naming in children: effects of referential uncertainty and stimulus realism.

Authors:  C J Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1992-02

Review 6.  Stages of lexical access in language production.

Authors:  G S Dell; P G O'Seaghdha
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

7.  Viewing and naming objects: eye movements during noun phrase production.

Authors:  A S Meyer; A M Sleiderink; W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-05

8.  Pronouncing "the" as "thee" to signal problems in speaking.

Authors:  J E Fox Tree; H H Clark
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-02

9.  Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms.

Authors:  J P Stemberger; B MacWhinney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  47 in total

1.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Harold Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

3.  Timed picture naming in seven languages.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Simona D'Amico; Thomas Jacobsen; Anna Székely; Elena Andonova; Antonella Devescovi; Dan Herron; Ching Ching Lu; Thomas Pechmann; Csaba Pléh; Nicole Wicha; Kara Federmeier; Irini Gerdjikova; Gabriel Gutierrez; Daisy Hung; Jeanne Hsu; Gowri Iyer; Katherine Kohnert; Teodora Mehotcheva; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Angela Tzeng; Ovid Tzeng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

4.  Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-01

5.  Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.

Authors:  Randi C Martin; Jason E Crowther; Meredith Knight; Franklin P Tamborello; Chin-Lung Yang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-05-23

6.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 7.  Observing the what and when of language production for different age groups by monitoring speakers' eye movements.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin; Daniel H Spieler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Planning at the phonological level during sentence production.

Authors:  Tatiana T Schnur; Albert Costa; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-03

9.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

10.  Ways of looking ahead: hierarchical planning in language production.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.