Literature DB >> 18394661

Limited impact of homeostatic plasticity on motor learning in humans.

Min-Fang Kuo1, Mandy Unger, David Liebetanz, Nicolas Lang, Frithjof Tergau, Walter Paulus, Michael A Nitsche.   

Abstract

Neuroplasticity is the adaptive modification of network connectivity in response to environmental demands and has been identified as a major physiological correlate of learning. Since unrestricted neuroplastic modifications of network connectivity will result in a de-stabilization of the system, metaplastic modification rules have been proposed for keeping plastic connectivity changes within a useful dynamic range. In this connection, the modification threshold to achieve synaptic strengthening is thought to correlate negatively with the history of activity of the respective neurons, i.e. high previous activity enhances the threshold for synaptic strengthening and vice versa. However, the relevance of metaplasticity for actual learning processes has not been tested so far. We reduced or enhanced motor cortex excitability before performance of the serial reaction time task (SRTT), a sequential motor learning paradigm, and a reaction time task (RTT) by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). If homeostatic rules apply, excitability-diminishing cathodal tDCS should improve subsequent motor learning, especially if combined with the partial NMDA receptor-agonist d-cycloserine, which selectively enhances efficacy of active receptors, while excitability-enhancing anodal tDCS should reduce it. Only the results for anodal tDCS, when combined with d-cycloserine, were in accordance with the rules of homeostatic plasticity. We conclude that homeostatic plasticity, as tested here, has a limited influence on implicit sequential motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18394661     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  54 in total

1.  Modulation of effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor cortex (M1) by conditioning stimulation of the opposite M1.

Authors:  Patrick Ragert; Mickael Camus; Yves Vandermeeren; Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Time- but not sleep-dependent consolidation of tDCS-enhanced visuomotor skills.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Jan Torben Fischer; George Prichard; Cornelius Weiller; Leonardo G Cohen; Brita Fritsch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning.

Authors:  Aishwarya Sriraman; Tatsuya Oishi; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Michael A Nitsche; Nadia Bolognini; Marom Bikson; Tim Wagner; Lotfi Merabet; Dylan J Edwards; Antoni Valero-Cabre; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Roberta Ferrucci; Alberto Priori; Paulo Sergio Boggio; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  One hertz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over dorsal premotor cortex enhances offline motor memory consolidation for sequence-specific implicit learning.

Authors:  S K Meehan; J R Zabukovec; E Dao; K L Cheung; M A Linsdell; L A Boyd
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Combining d-cycloserine with motor training does not result in improved general motor learning in neurologically intact people or in people with stroke.

Authors:  Kendra M Cherry; Eric J Lenze; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances motor learning in older adults.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Timothy Hunter; Paul Sacco; Michael A Nitsche; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.

Authors:  D J Edwards; H I Krebs; A Rykman; J Zipse; G W Thickbroom; F L Mastaglia; A Pascual-Leone; B T Volpe
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Maged Elwassif
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.