Literature DB >> 25063361

Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning.

Aishwarya Sriraman1, Tatsuya Oishi2, Sangeetha Madhavan3.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has gained increasing interest in neurorehabilitation with its ability to modulate cortical excitability, and thereby influence neural plasticity and functional recovery. While the beneficial effects of tDCS on motor learning and function have been recognized, there is no clear consensus regarding the timing of the tDCS priming protocol in relation to the intervention especially with respect to lower limb motor learning. Depending on the time of priming in relation to the training task, the neural mechanisms of priming (gating vs. homeostatic plasticity) are different and thereby subsequently affect motor learning. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the interaction of tDCS with subsequent vs. concurrent motor learning using an ankle visuomotor skill learning paradigm. Twelve healthy participants were tested under three stimulation conditions: (1) anodal tDCS prior to the motor task (tDCS-before), (2) anodal tDCS during the motor task (tDCS-during) and (3) sham tDCS during the motor task (tDCS-sham). Results revealed that tDCS application during practice of a skilled motor task increased motor performance compared to tDCS applied prior to motor practice. Both tDCS groups demonstrated enhanced motor learning when tested 24 hours after practice. We conclude that the priming effects of tDCS are timing dependent, and maybe a critical regulatory feature in determining outcomes of priming with tDCS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Motor skill; Neuroplasticity; TDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25063361      PMCID: PMC4166556          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  48 in total

1.  Postsynaptic depolarization scales quantal amplitude in cortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  K R Leslie; S B Nelson; G G Turrigiano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Rafael Polania; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; Peter Dechent; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Bidirectional activity-dependent regulation of neuronal ion channel phosphorylation.

Authors:  Hiroaki Misonou; Milena Menegola; Durga P Mohapatra; Lauren K Guy; Kang-Sik Park; James S Trimmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

Authors:  C J Stagg; G Jayaram; D Pastor; Z T Kincses; P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Task-specific effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning.

Authors:  Cinthia Maria Saucedo Marquez; Xue Zhang; Stephan Patrick Swinnen; Raf Meesen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  31 in total

1.  Effects of anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 on ankle reaction time in young adults.

Authors:  Daya Devanathan; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Ipsilateral Motor Pathways and Transcallosal Inhibition During Lower Limb Movement After Stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Holly Calhoun; Stacey Rimikis; Mara Steinberg Lowe; Rebecca Wellner; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Anodal tDCS of the lower limb M1 does not acutely affect clinical blood pressure and heart rate in healthy and post stroke individuals.

Authors:  Tai Tri Nguyen; John Ugwu; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  SOJ Neurol       Date:  2015-12-01

5.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Victoria Smith; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 6.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

7.  Motor priming in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Stoykov; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Influence of neurovascular mechanisms on response to tDCS: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Pooja C Iyer; Alexander Rosenberg; Tracy Baynard; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Post-training stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex impairs working memory training performance.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Benjamin Katz; Austin Moon; Sheebani Talati; Tessa R Abagis; John Jonides; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 10.  Corticospinal Motor Circuit Plasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: Harnessing Neuroplasticity to Improve Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Syed Faraz Kazim; Christian A Bowers; Chad D Cole; Samantha Varela; Zafar Karimov; Erick Martinez; Jonathan V Ogulnick; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.