Literature DB >> 19474173

Modulation of effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor cortex (M1) by conditioning stimulation of the opposite M1.

Patrick Ragert1, Mickael Camus, Yves Vandermeeren, Michael A Dimyan, Leonardo G Cohen.   

Abstract

The excitability of the human primary motor cortex (M1) as tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depends on its previous history of neural activity. Homeostatic plasticity might be one important physiological mechanism for the regulation of corticospinal excitability and synaptic plasticity. Although homeostatic plasticity has been demonstrated locally within M1, it is not known whether priming M1 could result in similar homeostatic effects in the homologous M1 of the opposite hemisphere. Here, we sought to determine whether down-regulating excitability (priming) in the right (R) M1 with 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) changes the excitability-enhancing effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied over the homologous left (L) M1. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups in a sham-controlled parallel design with real or sham R M1 1-Hz TMS stimulation always preceding L M1 iTBS or sham by about 10 min. The primary outcome measure was corticospinal excitability in the L M1, as measured by recruitment curves (RCs). Secondary outcome measures included pinch force, simple reaction time, and tapping speed assessed in the right hand. The main finding of this study was that preconditioning R M1 with 1-Hz rTMS significantly decreased the excitability-enhancing effects of subsequent L M1 iTBS on RCs. Application of 1-Hz rTMS over R M1 alone and iTBS over L M1 alone resulted in increased RC in L M1 relative to sham interventions. The present findings are consistent with the hypothesis that homeostatic mechanisms operating across hemispheric boundaries contribute to regulate motor cortical function in the primary motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474173      PMCID: PMC2724345          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00274.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human primary motor cortex reduces intracortical paired-pulse inhibition.

Authors:  A Peinemann; C Lehner; C Mentschel; A Münchau; B Conrad; H R Siebner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Interhemispheric inhibition between primary motor cortices: what have we learned?

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

6.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; N Kashman; G Volland; K Weber; M Dowe; S Rogers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; K Weber; G Volland; N Kashman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex.

Authors:  E L Bienenstock; L N Cooper; P W Munro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Nagako Murase; Julie Duque; Riccardo Mazzocchio; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

2.  BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with altered activity-dependent modulation of short-interval intracortical inhibition in bilateral M1.

Authors:  Olivier Morin-Moncet; Alexandre Latulipe-Loiselle; Jean-Marc Therrien-Blanchet; Hugo Theoret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M C Ridding; U Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Primary motor cortical metaplasticity induced by priming over the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Masashi Hamada; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yasuo Terao; Shingo Okabe; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Hideyuki Matsumoto; Yuichiro Shirota; Shinya Ohminami; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lindsay Oberman; Dylan Edwards; Mark Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Chih-Pin Wang; Po-Yi Tsai; Tsui Fen Yang; Kuang-Yao Yang; Chien-Chih Wang
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.243

7.  A Comparison of Primed Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatments in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Haitao Chu; David C Anderson; Linda E Krach; LeAnn Snow; Teresa J Kimberley; James R Carey
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Neural plasticity and its contribution to functional recovery.

Authors:  Nikhil Sharma; Joseph Classen; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 9.  Combinations of stroke neurorehabilitation to facilitate motor recovery: perspectives on Hebbian plasticity and homeostatic metaplasticity.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor--a major player in stimulation-induced homeostatic metaplasticity of human motor cortex?

Authors:  Claudia Mastroeni; Til Ole Bergmann; Vincenzo Rizzo; Christoph Ritter; Christine Klein; Ines Pohlmann; Norbert Brueggemann; Angelo Quartarone; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.