Literature DB >> 18389319

Incorporation of proficiency criteria for basic laparoscopic skills training: how does it work?

E G G Verdaasdonk1, J Dankelman, J F Lange, L P S Stassen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is desirable that surgical trainees are proficient in basic laparoscopic motor skills (eye-hand coordination). The present study evaluated the use of predefined proficiency criteria on a basic virtual reality (VR) simulator in preparation for a laparoscopic course on animal models.
METHODS: Twenty-eight surgical trainees who enrolled for a basic laparoscopic course were trained on a basic (VR) simulator until their performance met predefined criteria. Two different criteria were defined, based on the performance of experienced laparoscopic surgeons on the simulator. In the first group (n = 10), the criteria were set at the 75th percentile of the laparoscopic surgeons' performance on the simulator and in the second group, at the 50th percentile (n = 18). Training time and number of attempts needed until the performance criteria were met were measured.
RESULTS: In the first group, training time needed to pass the test ranged from 29 to 77 min (median: 63 min) with a range of 43-90 attempts (median 61 attempts). In the second group, training time ranged from 38 to 180 min (median 80 min) with a range of 55-233 attempts (median 95 attempts). Experience with assisting or performing laparoscopic procedures varied widely and was not correlated with the training time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance criteria for training laparoscopic motor skills on a (VR) simulator resulted in wide variation between surgical trainees in time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria. This demands training courses with a flexible time span tailored to the individual level of the trainee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389319     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9849-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Consultant surgeons' opinion of the skills required of basic surgical trainees.

Authors:  P J Baldwin; A M Paisley; S P Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation?

Authors:  A Cuschieri; N Francis; J Crosby; G B Hanna
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?

Authors:  D J Scott; P C Bergen; R V Rege; R Laycock; S T Tesfay; R J Valentine; D M Euhus; D R Jeyarajah; W M Thompson; D B Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Surgical simulation - a 'good idea whose time has come'.

Authors:  H R Champion; A G Gallagher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough?

Authors:  William C Brunner; James R Korndorffer; Rafael Sierra; Nader N Massarweh; J Bruce Dunne; C Lillian Yau; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; L J Monteny; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Krishna Moorthy; Julian Hance; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for surgical novices.

Authors:  Emmeline Nugent; Nicole Shirilla; Adnan Hafeez; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Oscar Traynor; Anthony M Harrison; Paul Neary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Koen W van Dongen; Gunnar Ahlberg; Luigi Bonavina; Fiona J Carter; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anders Hyltander; Marlies P Schijven; Alessandro Stefani; David C van der Zee; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The spaced learning concept significantly improves training for laparoscopic suturing: a pilot randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Michael Boettcher; Johannes Boettcher; Stefan Mietzsch; Thomas Krebs; Robert Bergholz; Konrad Reinshagen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effective and efficient learning in the operating theater with intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; B Middel; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Charlotte Ringsted; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The learning effect of intraoperative video-enhanced surgical procedure training.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; L J Middel; S A Koopal; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts.

Authors:  Mark Wilson; John McGrath; Samuel Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard Masters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Mark R Wilson; John S McGrath; Samuel J Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard S W Masters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements.

Authors:  Anil Ufuk Batmaz; Michel de Mathelin; Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-11-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.