E G G Verdaasdonk1, J Dankelman, J F Lange, L P S Stassen. 1. Faculty of Mechanical, Marine and Materials Engineering, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands. e.g.g.verdaasdonk@tudelft.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is desirable that surgical trainees are proficient in basic laparoscopic motor skills (eye-hand coordination). The present study evaluated the use of predefined proficiency criteria on a basic virtual reality (VR) simulator in preparation for a laparoscopic course on animal models. METHODS: Twenty-eight surgical trainees who enrolled for a basic laparoscopic course were trained on a basic (VR) simulator until their performance met predefined criteria. Two different criteria were defined, based on the performance of experienced laparoscopic surgeons on the simulator. In the first group (n = 10), the criteria were set at the 75th percentile of the laparoscopic surgeons' performance on the simulator and in the second group, at the 50th percentile (n = 18). Training time and number of attempts needed until the performance criteria were met were measured. RESULTS: In the first group, training time needed to pass the test ranged from 29 to 77 min (median: 63 min) with a range of 43-90 attempts (median 61 attempts). In the second group, training time ranged from 38 to 180 min (median 80 min) with a range of 55-233 attempts (median 95 attempts). Experience with assisting or performing laparoscopic procedures varied widely and was not correlated with the training time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The performance criteria for training laparoscopic motor skills on a (VR) simulator resulted in wide variation between surgical trainees in time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria. This demands training courses with a flexible time span tailored to the individual level of the trainee.
BACKGROUND: It is desirable that surgical trainees are proficient in basic laparoscopic motor skills (eye-hand coordination). The present study evaluated the use of predefined proficiency criteria on a basic virtual reality (VR) simulator in preparation for a laparoscopic course on animal models. METHODS: Twenty-eight surgical trainees who enrolled for a basic laparoscopic course were trained on a basic (VR) simulator until their performance met predefined criteria. Two different criteria were defined, based on the performance of experienced laparoscopic surgeons on the simulator. In the first group (n = 10), the criteria were set at the 75th percentile of the laparoscopic surgeons' performance on the simulator and in the second group, at the 50th percentile (n = 18). Training time and number of attempts needed until the performance criteria were met were measured. RESULTS: In the first group, training time needed to pass the test ranged from 29 to 77 min (median: 63 min) with a range of 43-90 attempts (median 61 attempts). In the second group, training time ranged from 38 to 180 min (median 80 min) with a range of 55-233 attempts (median 95 attempts). Experience with assisting or performing laparoscopic procedures varied widely and was not correlated with the training time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The performance criteria for training laparoscopic motor skills on a (VR) simulator resulted in wide variation between surgical trainees in time and number of attempts needed to pass the criteria. This demands training courses with a flexible time span tailored to the individual level of the trainee.
Authors: D J Scott; P C Bergen; R V Rege; R Laycock; S T Tesfay; R J Valentine; D M Euhus; D R Jeyarajah; W M Thompson; D B Jones Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: William C Brunner; James R Korndorffer; Rafael Sierra; Nader N Massarweh; J Bruce Dunne; C Lillian Yau; Daniel J Scott Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Emmeline Nugent; Nicole Shirilla; Adnan Hafeez; Diarmuid S O'Riordain; Oscar Traynor; Anthony M Harrison; Paul Neary Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Koen W van Dongen; Gunnar Ahlberg; Luigi Bonavina; Fiona J Carter; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anders Hyltander; Marlies P Schijven; Alessandro Stefani; David C van der Zee; Ivo A M J Broeders Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Michael Boettcher; Johannes Boettcher; Stefan Mietzsch; Thomas Krebs; Robert Bergholz; Konrad Reinshagen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mark Wilson; John McGrath; Samuel Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard Masters Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mark R Wilson; John S McGrath; Samuel J Vine; James Brewer; David Defriend; Richard S W Masters Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 4.584