Michael Boettcher1, Johannes Boettcher2,3, Stefan Mietzsch2, Thomas Krebs2,4, Robert Bergholz2, Konrad Reinshagen2. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. m.boettcher@uke.de. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Institute of Psychology, University Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24118, Kiel, Germany. 4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, Claudiusstr. 6, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spaced learning has been shown to be effective in various areas like traditional knowledge or motor skill acquisition. To evaluate the impact of implementation of the spaced learning concept in laparoscopic training was the aim of this study. METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness of spaced learning, subjects were asked to perform four surgeon's square knots on a bowel model prior and post 3 h of hands-on training. All subjects were medical students and novice in laparoscopic suturing. Total time, knot stability (evaluated via tensiometer), suture accuracy, knot quality (Muresan score), and laparoscopic performance (Munz checklist) were assessed. Moreover, motivation was accessed using Questionnaire on Current Motivation. RESULTS:Twenty students were included in the study; after simple randomization, ten were trained using "spaced learning" concept and ten conservatively. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and improved after training significantly regarding all aspects assessed in this study. Subjects that trained via spaced learning were superior in terms of suture performance, knot quality, and suture strength. Ultimately, spaced learning significantly decreased anxiety and impression of challenge compared to controls. CONCLUSION: The spaced learning concept is very suitable for complex motor skill acquisition like laparoscopic suturing and knot tying. It significantly improves laparoscopic performance and knot quality as shown by the knot score and suture strength. Thus, we recommend to incorporate spaced learning into training courses and surgical programs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Spaced learning has been shown to be effective in various areas like traditional knowledge or motor skill acquisition. To evaluate the impact of implementation of the spaced learning concept in laparoscopic training was the aim of this study. METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness of spaced learning, subjects were asked to perform four surgeon's square knots on a bowel model prior and post 3 h of hands-on training. All subjects were medical students and novice in laparoscopic suturing. Total time, knot stability (evaluated via tensiometer), suture accuracy, knot quality (Muresan score), and laparoscopic performance (Munz checklist) were assessed. Moreover, motivation was accessed using Questionnaire on Current Motivation. RESULTS: Twenty students were included in the study; after simple randomization, ten were trained using "spaced learning" concept and ten conservatively. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and improved after training significantly regarding all aspects assessed in this study. Subjects that trained via spaced learning were superior in terms of suture performance, knot quality, and suture strength. Ultimately, spaced learning significantly decreased anxiety and impression of challenge compared to controls. CONCLUSION: The spaced learning concept is very suitable for complex motor skill acquisition like laparoscopic suturing and knot tying. It significantly improves laparoscopic performance and knot quality as shown by the knot score and suture strength. Thus, we recommend to incorporate spaced learning into training courses and surgical programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Laparoscopy; Learning; Open; Surgery; Suturing; Training
Authors: Yaron Munz; Alex M Almoudaris; Krishna Moorthy; Aristotelis Dosis; Alexander D Liddle; Ara W Darzi Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Cornelis J Hopmans; Pieter T den Hoed; Lijckle van der Laan; Erwin van der Harst; Maarten van der Elst; Guido H H Mannaerts; Imro Dawson; Reinier Timman; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan N M IJzermans Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Jeanett Strandbygaard; Flemming Bjerrum; Mathilde Maagaard; Per Winkel; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen; Charlotte Ringsted; Christian Gluud; Teodor Grantcharov; Bent Ottesen; Jette Led Sorensen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S R Dawe; G N Pena; J A Windsor; J A J L Broeders; P C Cregan; P J Hewett; G J Maddern Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Marit Kayser; Thomas Franz Krebs; Ibrahim Alkatout; Timo Kayser; Katja Reischig; Jonas Baastrup; Andreas Meinzer; Katja Ulrich; Daniar Osmonov; Robert Bergholz Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-02-03
Authors: Marjolein Versteeg; Renée A Hendriks; Aliki Thomas; Belinda W C Ommering; Paul Steendijk Journal: Med Educ Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 6.251