Literature DB >> 10460649

Consultant surgeons' opinion of the skills required of basic surgical trainees.

P J Baldwin1, A M Paisley, S P Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate and appropriate assessment of surgical trainees requires clear determination of the skills needed for surgical competence. This study was designed to identify those skills, rank them in order of importance and translate them into behavioural terms.
METHODS: A Delphi technique, using anonymous postal questionnaires, was used. All consultant surgeons in South-East Scotland were asked to identify the skills they expected of surgical trainees. Skills identified were then returned to all consultants for weighting. Differences among specialties in the importance of each item were identified using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The qualities identified fell into five domains: technical skills, clinical skills, interaction with patients and relatives, teamwork, and application of knowledge. Consultants from all specialties gave high weightings to the generic domains of clinical skills, teamwork, and interaction with patients and relatives.
CONCLUSION: This study has identified the skills considered necessary by consultant surgeons in Scotland for a successful surgical career. Contrary to expectation, consultant surgeons value many generic skills more highly than technical skills, indicating that they value well rounded doctors, not just those with technical ability. The characteristics identified are being used to develop an assessment tool for use on basic surgical trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10460649     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01169.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

1.  Sports medicine and the accident and emergency medicine specialist.

Authors:  L Abernethy; O McNally; D MacAuley; S O'Neill
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Sport and exercise medicine in undergraduate medical schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  M Cullen; O McNally; S O Neill; D Macauley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  What is a sports medicine specialist? A pilot study.

Authors:  B Thompson; O McNally; S O Neill; D Macauley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Assessment of basic surgical trainees: can we do more?

Authors:  K Somaseker; J Shankar; K P Conway; M E Foster; M H Lewis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Defining the sports medicine specialist in the United Kingdom: a Delphi study.

Authors:  B Thompson; D MacAuley; O McNally; S O'Neill
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Shabnam Undre; Andrew N Healey; Ara Darzi; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A decision-making learning and assessment tool in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sudip K Sarker; Saif Rehman; Meera Ladwa; Avril Chang; Charles Vincent
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The impact of self-belief on laparoscopic performance of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  K Maschuw; T Osei-Agyemang; P Weyers; R Danila; K Bin Dayne; M Rothmund; I Hassan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Incorporation of proficiency criteria for basic laparoscopic skills training: how does it work?

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; J Dankelman; J F Lange; L P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.