Literature DB >> 18389316

Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

B Topal1, S Fieuws, K Tomczyk, R Aerts, W Van Steenbergen, C Verslype, F Penninckx.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The probability that a patient has common bile duct stones (CBDS) is a key factor in determining diagnostic and treatment strategies. This prospective cohort study evaluated the accuracy of clinical models in predicting CBDS for patients who will undergo cholecystectomy for lithiasis.
METHODS: From October 2005 until September 2006, 335 consecutive patients with symptoms of gallstone disease underwent cholecystectomy. Statistical analysis was performed on prospective patient data obtained at the time of first presentation to the hospital. Demonstrable CBDS at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was considered the gold standard for the presence of CBDS.
RESULTS: Common bile duct stones were demonstrated in 53 patients. For 35 patients, ERCP was performed, with successful stone clearance in 24 of 30 patients who had proven CBDS. In 29 patients, IOC showed CBDS, which were managed successfully via laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, with stone extraction at the time of cholecystectomy. Prospective validation of the existing model for CBDS resulted in a predictive accuracy rate of 73%. The new model showed a predictive accuracy rate of 79%.
CONCLUSION: Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting CBDS in patients with cholelithiasis. Management strategies should be based on the local availability of therapeutic expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389316     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9868-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  J C Varghese; R P Liddell; M A Farrell; F E Murray; H Osborne; M J Lee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Dharmendra Verma; Asha Kapadia; Glenn M Eisen; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States: results of a survey.

Authors:  J Bingener; W H Schwesinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ.

Authors:  E S J Clayton; S Connor; N Alexakis; E Leandros
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Christophe Aubé; Benoit Delorme; Thierry Yzet; Pascal Burtin; Jérome Lebigot; Patrick Pessaux; Catherine Gondry-Jouet; Jean Boyer; Christine Caron
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Intraoperative cholangiography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  N Demartines; L Eisner; K Schnabel; R Fried; M Zuber; F Harder
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-02

9.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M E Stoker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lisa M Brown; Stanley J Rogers; John P Cello; Karen J Brasel; John M Inadomi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons.

Authors:  Rosa Jorba; Mihai C Pavel; Erik Llàcer-Millán; Laia Estalella; Mar Achalandabaso; Elisabet Julià-Verdaguer; Esther Nve; Erlinda D Padilla-Zegarra; Josep M Badia; Donal B O'Connor; Robert Memba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.