Literature DB >> 10077048

Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

F Prat1, B Meduri, B Ducot, R Chiche, R Salimbeni-Bartolini, G Pelletier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define accurate and useful predictors of common bile duct stones (CBDS). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The ability to predict CBDS with noninvasive tests can avoid unnecessary, costly, or risky procedures.
METHODS: All patients referred for examination for CBDS by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) from 1993-1996 were prospectively entered in a database. In a first sample selected randomly from the whole population, predictors of CBDS were determined by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Predictors were subsequently tested in that sample and in the rest of the population. A separate analysis was done for patients planned for cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty patients (328 men, 552 women), aged 57.8 +/- 17 years (range 16-94), were included. The prevalence of CBDS was 18.8%. Age, serum levels of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase, and the existence of jaundice and fever, a dilated bile duct, and a pathologic gallbladder were found to be associated with CBDS. Logistic regression was undertaken separately for patients younger than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; pathologic gallbladder; dilated bile duct) and older than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; fever > 38 degrees C; dilated bile duct). Odds ratios were 3 to 6.7. The model was satisfactorily applicable to the second sample; age <70 years: chi2 = 3.3 (NS); age >70 years: chi2 = 3.8 (NS). In patients younger than age 70 and planned for cholecystectomy, the combination of the level of GGT and dilated bile duct predicted CBDS accurately.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple screening of patients at risk for CBDS can be achieved with three predictive criteria adapted for the patient's age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10077048      PMCID: PMC1191701          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P A Abboud; P F Malet; J A Berlin; R Staroscik; M D Cabana; J R Clarke; J A Shea; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP.

Authors:  L Palazzo; P P Girollet; M Salmeron; C Silvain; G Roseau; J M Canard; S Chaussade; D Couturier; J A Paolaggi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Management of choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; N J Soper
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators. A prospective evaluation.

Authors:  M Hauer-Jensen; R Kåresen; K Nygaard; K Solheim; E Amlie; O Havig; K O Viddal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones.

Authors:  E C Saltzstein; J B Peacock; M D Thomas
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-03

7.  Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; C Jagger; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-01

8.  Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M I Canto; A Chak; T Stellato; M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis.

Authors:  F Prat; G Amouyal; P Amouyal; G Pelletier; J Fritsch; A D Choury; C Buffet; J P Etienne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.

Authors:  A N Barkun; J S Barkun; G M Fried; G Ghitulescu; O Steinmetz; C Pham; J L Meakins; C A Goresky
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  31 in total

1.  Three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy: a reliable tool for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Michele Simone; Didier Mutter; Francesco Rubino; Erik Dutson; Catherine Roy; Luc Soler; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Gallstone pancreatitis--who really needs an ERCP?

Authors:  M F Byrne
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Dynamic analysis of commonly used biochemical parameters to predict common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Stéphane Bourgouin; Xavier Truchet; Gatien Lamblin; Jérôme De Roulhac; Jean-Philippe Platel; Paul Balandraud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Nigel T Barwood; Liora J Valinsky; Michael S T Hobbs; David R Fletcher; Matthew W Knuiman; Steve C Ridout
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function.

Authors:  Bilal O Al-Jiffry; Abdeen Elfateh; Tariq Chundrigar; Bassem Othman; Owaid Almalki; Fares Rayza; Hashem Niyaz; Hesham Elmakhzangy; Mohammed Hatem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

Authors:  B Topal; S Fieuws; K Tomczyk; R Aerts; W Van Steenbergen; C Verslype; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Eleanor C Fung; D Wayne Overby; William Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease.

Authors:  C N Parnaby; J T Jenkins; J C Ferguson; B W A Williamson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.