Literature DB >> 10668871

Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones.

N Demartines1, L Eisner, K Schnabel, R Fried, M Zuber, F Harder.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) offers the potential for accurate, noninvasive detection of common bile duct stones (CBDSs) before cholecystectomy, and for a consequent reduction in the incidence of preoperative negative diagnoses associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study: MRC results were correlated with ERC (high-risk patients) or intraoperative cholangiography (moderate-risk patients).
SETTING: A university hospital providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care. PATIENTS: Seventy patients with suspected CBDSs scheduled to undergo elective cholecystectomy between April 15, 1997, and September 30, 1998. Forty patients were considered at high risk and 30 at moderate risk for CBDSs, according to results of liver function tests and sonograms of the upper abdomen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmation or exclusion of CBDSs by MRC was assessed by a panel of radiologists who were unaware of the ERC results. Results of ERC and intraoperative cholangiography were analyzed by the investigating gastroenterologists or surgeon.
RESULTS: Results of MRC were positive for CBDSs in 21 (52%) of 40 high-risk patients, a finding confirmed by preoperative ERC in 19 (90%) of 21 patients. Results of MRC were positive for CBDSs in 6 (20%) of 30 moderate-risk patients, all of which were confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography. Finally, CBDSs were present in 19 (48%) of 40 high-risk patients and 6 (20%) of 30 moderate-risk patients (P = .02). Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRC were 100% and 95.6%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive values were 92.6% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance cholangiography is a reliable, noninvasive method for the detection or exclusion of CBDSs, and seems to reduce the frequency of negative diagnoses associated with ERC. Magnetic resonance cholangiography revealed no CBDSs in 19 (48%) of 40 patients at high risk for CBDSs. Thus, MRC-based diagnosis has the potential to reduce the number of invasive preoperative diagnostic procedures and their associated risks and overall health care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10668871     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.135.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  21 in total

1.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Ten years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison between a developed and a less developed country.

Authors:  Zdrinko Brekalo; Paolo Innocenti; Goran Duzel; Guido Liddo; Enzo Ballone; Vladimir J Simunović
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Is routine MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) justified prior to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  C A Nebiker; S A Baierlein; S Beck; M von Flüe; C Ackermann; R Peterli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ankur Mandelia; Arun Kumar Gupta; Devendra Kumar Verma; Sanjeev Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical research for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Yundong Wang; Zhen Han; Xiaoping Niu; Yuliang Jia; Heming Yuan; Guozheng Zhang; Chiyi He
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T H Liu; E T Consorti; A Kawashima; E P Tamm; K L Kwong; B S Gill; J H Sellin; E K Peden; D W Mercer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

Authors:  B Topal; S Fieuws; K Tomczyk; R Aerts; W Van Steenbergen; C Verslype; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Selective MRCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Stuart Mercer; Sukhpal Singh; Iain Paterson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis.

Authors:  John G Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.