Literature DB >> 25742665

The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.

Blake J Roessler1, Nicholas H Steneck2, Lisa Connally3.   

Abstract

In this article, we report on an effort to study the development and usefulness of a large, broad-use, opt-in biorepository for genomic research, focusing on three ethical issues: providing appropriate understanding, recruiting in ways that do not comprise autonomous decisions, and assessing costs versus benefits. We conclude the following: (a) Understanding can be improved by separating the task of informing subjects from documenting informed consent (Common Rule) and permission to use personal health information and samples for research (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA]); however, regulations might have to be changed to accommodate this approach. (b) Changing recruiting methods increases efficiency but can interfere with subject autonomy. (c) Finally, we propose a framework for the objective evaluation of the utility of biorepositories and suggest that more attention needs to be paid to use and sustainability.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomy; biobank; biorepository; cost–benefit analysis; ethics; genomic research; informed consent; understanding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742665      PMCID: PMC4382351          DOI: 10.1177/1556264614564975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  40 in total

1.  What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  C Behrendt; T Gölz; C Roesler; H Bertz; A Wünsch
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Length and complexity of US and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Lelia Chaisson; Holly A Taylor; Jennifer Lohse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Biobankonomics: a taxonomy for evaluating the economic benefits of standardized centralized human biobanking for translational research.

Authors:  Joyce Rogers; Todd Carolin; Jimmie Vaught; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

4.  Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?

Authors:  Jiwon Koh; Eurah Goh; Kyung-Sang Yu; Belong Cho; Jeong Hee Yang
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Improving the informed consent process--a booklet on participants' rights in medical research.

Authors:  Jocelyne R Benatar; Philip McKibbin; Ralph A H Stewart
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2012-09-21

6.  An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  H E Taylor; D E P Bramley
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Michael B Bracken; Ben Djulbegovic; Silvio Garattini; Jonathan Grant; A Metin Gülmezoglu; David W Howells; John P A Ioannidis; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Consent for use of clinical leftover biosample: a survey among Chinese patients and the general public.

Authors:  Yi Ma; HuiLi Dai; LiMin Wang; LiJun Zhu; HanBing Zou; XianMing Kong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Authors:  Kenji Matsui; Reidar K Lie; Tanvir C Turin; Yoshikuni Kita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Ian Conlon; Anders G Nelson; James P Evans; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  2 in total

1.  Optimizing Enrollment of Patients into Nephrology Research Studies.

Authors:  David T Selewski; Emily G Herreshoff; Debbie S Gipson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.

Authors:  T J Kasperbauer; Colin Halverson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.