| Literature DB >> 25742665 |
Blake J Roessler1, Nicholas H Steneck2, Lisa Connally3.
Abstract
In this article, we report on an effort to study the development and usefulness of a large, broad-use, opt-in biorepository for genomic research, focusing on three ethical issues: providing appropriate understanding, recruiting in ways that do not comprise autonomous decisions, and assessing costs versus benefits. We conclude the following: (a) Understanding can be improved by separating the task of informing subjects from documenting informed consent (Common Rule) and permission to use personal health information and samples for research (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA]); however, regulations might have to be changed to accommodate this approach. (b) Changing recruiting methods increases efficiency but can interfere with subject autonomy. (c) Finally, we propose a framework for the objective evaluation of the utility of biorepositories and suggest that more attention needs to be paid to use and sustainability.Entities:
Keywords: autonomy; biobank; biorepository; cost–benefit analysis; ethics; genomic research; informed consent; understanding
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25742665 PMCID: PMC4382351 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614564975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742