Literature DB >> 11401922

Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study.

L Le Marchand1, A Lum-Jones, B Saltzman, V Visaya, A M Nomura, L N Kolonel.   

Abstract

This study assessed the feasibility of obtaining buccal cell DNA by mail from participants in a large, community-based cohort study in Hawaii. Mouthwash collection kits were sent to a total of 355 randomly selected Japanese, Caucasian, and Hawaiian cohort members. Subjects were requested to swish 10 ml of mouthwash in their mouth for 60 s and expel it into a collection cup, which they mailed back to our laboratory. Half of the subjects were requested to collect a second sample. After up to two mailings and two reminder phone calls, two-thirds of the subjects returned a sample. The participation rate was lower for Hawaiians (59.0%) than for Caucasians (68.1%) and Japanese (76.3%). Participation was not affected by requesting two specimens. Participants did not differ from the total sample in terms of education and smoking status. The mean DNA yield was lower in females (41.7 microg) than males (53.4 microg) and in Japanese (37.8 microg) as compared with Hawaiians (51.9 microg) and Caucasians (54.5 microg). For subjects who returned two samples, the DNA yields were similar when both specimens were extracted in the same batch. All samples were successfully genotyped for polymorphisms in the CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and NQO1 genes by PCR-RFLP. From these and previous data, we conclude that, in situations where blood samples cannot be obtained, mail collection of mouthwash samples should be considered because it yields substantial amounts of high-quality genomic DNA for large numbers of study subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11401922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  34 in total

Review 1.  Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rene Sterling; Gail E Henderson; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  New saliva DNA collection method compared to buccal cell collection techniques for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Nikki L Rogers; Shelley A Cole; Hao-Chang Lan; Aldo Crossa; Ellen W Demerath
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.937

3.  A simple method of genomic DNA extraction from human samples for PCR-RFLP analysis.

Authors:  Souvik Ghatak; Rajendra Bose Muthukumaran; Senthil Kumar Nachimuthu
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-12

4.  Feasibility of collecting self-sampled vaginal swabs by mail: quantity and quality of genomic DNA.

Authors:  M F D Baay; V Verhoeven; H A J Lambrechts; G G O Pattyn; F Lardon; P Van Royen; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Predictors of biospecimen donation in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Chiranjeev Dash; Julie R Palmer; Manuela V Wiedemeier; Cordelia W Russell; Lynn Rosenberg; Yvette C Cozier
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Buccal cells DNA extraction to obtain high quality human genomic DNA suitable for polymorphism genotyping by PCR-RFLP and Real-Time PCR.

Authors:  Erika Calvano Küchler; Patricia Nivoloni Tannure; Priscila Falagan-Lotsch; Taliria Silva Lopes; Jose Mauro Granjeiro; Lidia Maria Fonte Amorim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Feasibility of High-Throughput Genome-Wide Genotyping using DNA from Stored Buccal Cell Samples.

Authors:  Stephanie J Loomis; Lana M Olson; Louis R Pasquale; Janey Wiggs; Daniel Mirel; Andrew Crenshaw; Melissa Parkin; Brandon Rahhal; Stephanie Tetreault; Peter Kraft; Shelley S Tworoger; Jonathan L Haines; Jae H Kang
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-05-20

8.  Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Tracie Franklin; Stephen Chanock; Vinita Puri; Robert Welch; Nathaniel Rothman; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Determinants of DNA yield and purity collected with buccal cell samples.

Authors:  D B M A van Wieren-de Wijer; A H Maitland-van der Zee; A de Boer; S V Belitser; A A Kroon; P W de Leeuw; P Schiffers; R G J H Janssen; C M van Duijn; B H C H Stricker; O H Klungel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.

Authors:  Tetyana Zayats; Terri L Young; David A Mackey; François Malecaze; Patrick Calvas; Jeremy A Guggenheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.