UNLABELLED: This study used in-depth interviews and focus groups to evaluate osteoporosis care after a fracture. Patients (eligible women aged 67 who sustained a clinical fracture(s)), clinicians, and staff stated that an outreach program facilitated osteoporosis care management, but more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis treatment reduces fracture risk, but screening and treatment are underutilized, even after a fracture has occurred. This study evaluated key stakeholder perspectives about the care of osteoporosis after a fracture. METHODS: Participants were from a nonprofit health maintenance organization in the United States: eligible women members aged 67 or older who sustained a clinical fracture(s) (n = 10), quality and other health care managers (n = 20), primary care providers (n = 9), and orthopedic clinicians and staff (n = 28); total n = 67. In-depth interviews and focus groups elicited participant perspectives on an outreach program to patients and clinicians and other facilitators and barriers to care. Interviews and focus group sessions were transcribed and content-analyzed. RESULTS: Patients, clinicians, and staff stated that outreach facilitated osteoporosis care management, but important patient barriers remained. Patient knowledge gaps and fatalism were common. Providers stated that management needed to begin earlier, and longer-term patient support was necessary to address adherence. Orthopedic clinicians and staff expressed lack of confidence in their osteoporosis management but willingness to encourage treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although an outreach program assisted with the management of osteoporosis after a fracture, more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary to maximize osteoporosis management.
UNLABELLED: This study used in-depth interviews and focus groups to evaluate osteoporosis care after a fracture. Patients (eligible women aged 67 who sustained a clinical fracture(s)), clinicians, and staff stated that an outreach program facilitated osteoporosis care management, but more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary. INTRODUCTION:Osteoporosis treatment reduces fracture risk, but screening and treatment are underutilized, even after a fracture has occurred. This study evaluated key stakeholder perspectives about the care of osteoporosis after a fracture. METHODS:Participants were from a nonprofit health maintenance organization in the United States: eligible women members aged 67 or older who sustained a clinical fracture(s) (n = 10), quality and other health care managers (n = 20), primary care providers (n = 9), and orthopedic clinicians and staff (n = 28); total n = 67. In-depth interviews and focus groups elicited participant perspectives on an outreach program to patients and clinicians and other facilitators and barriers to care. Interviews and focus group sessions were transcribed and content-analyzed. RESULTS:Patients, clinicians, and staff stated that outreach facilitated osteoporosis care management, but important patient barriers remained. Patient knowledge gaps and fatalism were common. Providers stated that management needed to begin earlier, and longer-term patient support was necessary to address adherence. Orthopedic clinicians and staff expressed lack of confidence in their osteoporosis management but willingness to encourage treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Although an outreach program assisted with the management of osteoporosis after a fracture, more-tailored education and support and increased participation of orthopedic specialists appear necessary to maximize osteoporosis management.
Authors: S B Jaglal; C Cameron; G A Hawker; J Carroll; L Jaakkimainen; S M Cadarette; E R Bogoch; H Kreder; D Davis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S J Blalock; S S Currey; R F DeVellis; B M DeVellis; K B Giorgino; J J Anderson; M A Dooley; D T Gold Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2000 Jan-Feb
Authors: Susan B Jaglal; June Carroll; Gillian Hawker; Warren J McIsaac; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Suzanne M Cadarette; Cathy Cameron; Dave Davis Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Sumit R Majumdar; Brian H Rowe; Deb Folk; Jeffrey A Johnson; Brian H Holroyd; Donald W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Ivan P Steiner; Charles H Harley; Brian J Wirzba; David A Hanley; Sandra Blitz; Anthony S Russell Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-09-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Adrianne C Feldstein; William M Vollmer; David H Smith; Amanda Petrik; Jennifer Schneider; Harry Glauber; Michael Herson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Michael Herson; Eric Orwoll; Chuhe Chen; Mikel Aickin; Martha C Swain Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Aaron T Seaman; Melissa Steffen; Taisha Doo; Heather S Healy; Samantha L Solimeo Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: S R Majumdar; F A McAlister; J A Johnson; D L Weir; D Bellerose; D A Hanley; A S Russell; B H Rowe Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth Kitchin; Lang Chen; Sarah Morgan; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L Chou; P Shamdasani; A M Briggs; F M Cicuttini; K Sullivan; K L M D Seneviwickrama; A E Wluka Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 4.507