Literature DB >> 22836812

A randomized trial of a mailed intervention and self-scheduling to improve osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women.

Amy H Warriner1, Ryan C Outman, Elizabeth Kitchin, Lang Chen, Sarah Morgan, Kenneth G Saag, Jeffrey R Curtis.   

Abstract

Guidelines recommend bone density screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women 65 years or older, but <30% of eligible women undergo DXA testing. There is a need to identify a systematic, effective, and generalizable way to improve osteoporosis screening. A group randomized, controlled trial of women ≥65 years old with no DXA in the past 4 years, randomized to receive intervention materials (patient osteoporosis brochure and a letter explaining how to self-schedule a DXA scan) versus usual care (control) was undertaken. Outcome of interest was DXA completion. Of 2997 women meeting inclusion criteria, 977 were randomized to the intervention group. A total of 17.3% of women in the intervention group completed a DXA, compared to 5.2% in the control group (12.1% difference, p < 0.0001). When including only those medically appropriate, we found a difference of 19% between the two groups (p < 0.0001). DXA receipt was greater in main clinic patients compared to satellite clinic patients (20.9% main clinic versus 10.1% satellite clinic). The cost to print and mail the intervention was $0.79 per patient, per mailing. The number of women to whom intervention needed to be mailed to yield one extra DXA performed was 9, at a cost of $7.11. DXA scan completion was significantly improved through use of a mailed osteoporosis brochure and the availability for patients to self-schedule. This simple approach may be an effective component of a multifaceted quality improvement program to increase rates of osteoporosis screening.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836812      PMCID: PMC3502704          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  31 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Interactive voice response telephone calls to enhance bone mineral density testing.

Authors:  Jennifer M Polinski; Amanda Patrick; Colleen Truppo; Laura Breiner; Ya-Ting Chen; Cathy Egan; Saira Jan; Minal Patel; Thomas W Weiss; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults.

Authors:  D H Solomon; J S Finkelstein; J M Polinski; M Arnold; A Licari; D Cabral; C Canning; J Avorn; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; J J Allison; O D Williams; S D Person; M T Weaver; N W Weissman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The effects of an educational intervention on calcium intake and bone mineral content in young women with low calcium intake.

Authors:  B A Peterson; R C Klesges; E M Kaufman; T V Cooper; C M Vukadinovich
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

6.  Longitudinal patterns in the prevention of osteoporosis in glucocorticoid-treated patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Andrew O Westfall; Jeroan J Allison; Angela Becker; Linda Casebeer; Allison Freeman; Claire M Spettell; Norman W Weissman; Scott Wilke; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-08

7.  Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.

Authors:  Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Jason P Fine; John S Preisser; Ryan C May; Chenxi Li; Li-Yung Lui; David F Ransohoff; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States.

Authors:  J R Curtis; A Laster; D J Becker; L Carbone; L C Gary; M L Kilgore; R S Matthews; M A Morrisey; K G Saag; S B Tanner; E Delzell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of interactive voice response, patient mailing, and mailed registry to encourage screening for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L Heyworth; K Kleinman; S Oddleifson; L Bernstein; J Frampton; M Lehrer; K Salvato; T W Weiss; S R Simon; M Connelly
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Martin; M Viprey; B Castagne; B Merle; C Giroudon; R Chapurlat; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kastner; L Perrier; S E P Munce; C C Adhihetty; A Lau; J Hamid; V Treister; J Chan; Y Lai; S E Straus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  New methods for determining comparative effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Huifeng Yun; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Quality Improvement Strategies for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Smita Nayak; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Evaluation of an Osteoporosis Outreach Program for Men With a Fragility Fracture and Their Physicians.

Authors:  Margaret K Pasquale; Richard L Sheer; Alon Yehoshua; Adrienne McFadden; Arkadi Chines; John Caloyeras
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.178

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.