Literature DB >> 18360773

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases.

J Y Petit1, U Veronesi, P Rey, N Rotmensz, E Botteri, M Rietjens, C Garusi, F De Lorenzi, S Martella, R Bosco, A Manconi, A Luini, V Galimberti, P Veronesi, G B Ivaldi, R Orecchia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When the conservative treatment is not recommended, Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) is proposed more and more frequently for the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The risk of local recurrence behind the nipple areolar complex (NAC) is the main limiting factor of the NSM procedure. To minimize such risk, we proposed in 2002 a intraoperative radiotherapy of the preserved NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 2002 to November 2006, 579 cases (in 570 patients) of NSM were performed for carcinoma. The median follow up time was 19 months (Range: 1-60). The subcutaneous mastectomy was performed through an incision removing a portion of the skin overlying the tumour. An extemporaneous histological examination was performed on the retroareolar glandular tissue. If the histology was positive the patient was not considered eligible. Then an intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (ELIOT) of 16 Gy in one shot was delivered on the NAC area. An immediate breast reconstruction was done using implants in most cases and in several cases a musculocutaneous flaps, usually in large breast. The number of local recurrences was recorded and the correlation between their occurrence and the clinical and histological criteria were analysed using the Gray test statistical method in a competing framework.
RESULTS: In 516 cases the negative retroareolar frozen section biopsy was confirmed by the final histology, while in 63 cases, the final histology showed foci of carcinoma. Seven out of these 63 cases underwent a secondary NAC removal. In the 56 cases which preserved areolas we did not observe any local recurrence after 19 months follow up. The probability of retro areola positive histology increases with the tumour size. and was not related to the nodal status. The rate of local relapses was 0.9% per year. We didn't find any significant difference in the local relapse rate according to different patient's and tumour's features. Most relapses were located close to the tumour bed but never in the NAC area.
CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the local recurrence rate in the NSM completed with local radiotherapy on the NAC is not higher than the usual rate observed in the literature and the preservation of the NAC does not increase the risk. The absence of local recurrence in the region where a portion of glandular tissue has been purposely preserved is a good argument in favour of ELIOT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18360773     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9968-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  31 in total

1.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Extended Indications and Limitations.

Authors:  Markus Niemeyera; Johannes Ettla; Birgit Plattnera; Rainer Schmida; Daniel Müllerb; Hans-Günther Machensb; Marion Kiechlea; Stefan Paepkea
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Long-term follow-up of nipple-sparing mastectomy without radiotherapy: a single center study at a Japanese institution.

Authors:  Teruhisa Sakurai; Ning Zhang; Takaomi Suzuma; Teiji Umemura; Goro Yoshimura; Takeo Sakurai; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Quantitative assessment of nipple perfusion with near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Ashitate; Bernard T Lee; Long H Ngo; Rita G Laurence; Merlijn Hutteman; Rafiou Oketokoun; Elaine Lunsford; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 4.  Update in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Aurelia Trisliana Perdanasari; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Sarth Raj; Sebastian J Winocour; Rene D Largo
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Miyake; Satoki Kinoshita; Naoko Shimada; Ken Uchida; Hiroshi Takeyama; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Surgical decision making in conservative mastectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Catanuto; Nicola Rocco; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

Review 7.  Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

Authors:  Aidan T Manning; Virgilio S Sacchini
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

8.  Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M G Valero; T-A Moo; S Muhsen; E C Zabor; M Stempel; A Pusic; M L Gemignani; M Morrow; V Sacchini
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Sung Jun Yang; Jin Sup Eom; Taik Jong Lee; Sei Hyun Ahn; Byung Ho Son
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10

10.  Feasibility of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumor-Nipple Distance Less Than 2.0 cm.

Authors:  Jai Min Ryu; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Se Kyung Lee; Soo Youn Bae; Ha Woo Yi; Sungmin Park; Hyun-June Paik; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.