Literature DB >> 26855909

Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience.

Aidan T Manning1, Virgilio S Sacchini1.   

Abstract

Demand for conservative mastectomies continues to increase as more patients choose to undergo breast reconstruction, often with simultaneous contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). In addition, the increasing use of risk-reducing surgery in high-risk groups has contributed to the increased use of these techniques. We have reviewed the indications and outcomes of a large group of patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) at this institution. In total, 728 nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSMs) were performed in 413 patients between 2000 and 2013, for treatment of breast cancer (n=269) or risk reduction (n=459). Of 728 NSMs performed, 177 (24.3%) were in patients known to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation, or a genetic variant of uncertain significance. There was an incidental finding of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma in 22 (4.8%) and 8 (1.7%) of 459 prophylactic NSMs, respectively. In addition, unexpected invasive carcinoma was found in 17 of 98 therapeutic NSMs (17.3%) performed for DCIS. At median follow-up of 49 months, there were no known cases of local recurrence and only one case of regional recurrence. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 409 patients, most of whom underwent tissue expander/implant based procedures (n=401). Although 273 breasts (37.5%) had some evidence of skin desquamation at follow-up, most resolved spontaneously with 47 breasts (6.5%) requiring debridement. Other complications included hematoma in seven breasts (1%) and wound infection in 31 breasts (4.3%). Expander/implant removal was required in 20 cases (2.8%). The nipple-areola complex (NAC) was subsequently excised in 10 of 728 breasts (1.4%) due to oncologic concerns following assessment of retroareolar tissue. NSM was successful in most patients with an acceptable complication rate and in few patients subsequently undergoing removal of the NAC. Patients requiring mastectomy for breast cancer or risk reduction may now benefit from conservative mastectomy techniques such as NSM, resulting in improved cosmesis and, possibly, a reduced psychological impact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; conservative mastectomy; risk-reducing surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 26855909      PMCID: PMC4716859          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.10.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  35 in total

1.  Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  S S Kroll; A Khoo; S E Singletary; F C Ames; B G Wang; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  S S Kroll; M A Schusterman; H E Tadjalli; S E Singletary; F C Ames
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1997 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Pathological evaluation of nipple-sparing mastectomies with emphasis on occult nipple involvement: the Weill-Cornell experience with 325 cases.

Authors:  Rachel E K Eisenberg; Joanna S Y Chan; Alexander J Swistel; Syed A Hoda
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Late results of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  T J Meretoja; S Rasia; K A J von Smitten; S L Asko-Seljavaara; H O M Kuokkanen; T A Jahkola
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Recurrent breast cancer following immediate reconstruction with myocutaneous flaps.

Authors:  S A Slavin; S M Love; R M Goldwyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Natasha M Rueth; Heather Y Lin; Isabelle Bedrosian; Simona F Shaitelman; Naoto T Ueno; Yu Shen; Gildy Babiera
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne B Coopey; Rong Tang; Lan Lei; Phoebe E Freer; Kari Kansal; Amy S Colwell; Michele A Gadd; Michelle C Specht; William G Austen; Barbara L Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  10 in total

1.  MRI-based quantification of residual fibroglandular tissue of the breast after conservative mastectomies.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Georg Pfeiler; Alex Farr; Panagiotis Kapetas; Julia Furtner; Maria Bernathova; Veronika Schöpf; Paola Clauser; Maria A Marino; Katja Pinker; Pascal A Baltzer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Reconstructions Followed Long Term: A Consecutive Series of 185 Patients.

Authors:  Karin Isaksson; Brita Arver; Matteo Bottai; Andreas Pettersson; Marie Wickman; Kerstin Sandelin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in skin-sparing mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ryo Miyake; Satoki Kinoshita; Naoko Shimada; Ken Uchida; Hiroshi Takeyama; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Hehr; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Marciana-Nona Duma; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; David Krug; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederick Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Development of a Classification Tree to Predict Implant-Based Reconstruction Failure with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Jane Chen; Rie von Eyben; Paulina M Gutkin; Erin Hawley; Frederick M Dirbas; Gordon K Lee; Kathleen C Horst
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Analysis of Secondary Surgeries after Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Cancer Compared with Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Stacey J Jones; Philip Turton; Rajgopal Achuthan; Brian V Hogan; Shireen N Mckenzie; Baek Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 8.  Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bulent Citgez; Banu Yigit; Soysal Bas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31

9.  Satisfaction with Long-Term Aesthetic and 10 Years Oncologic Outcome following Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with or without Nipple Preservation.

Authors:  Rachel Louise O'Connell; Marios Konstantinos Tasoulis; Evguenia Hristova; Victoria Teoh; Ana Agusti; Ann Ward; Catherine Montgomery; Kabir Mohammed; Janet Self; Jennifer Elizabeth Rusby; Gerald Gui
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Pectoral Fascia Preservation in Oncological Mastectomy to Reduce Complications and Improve Reconstructions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaco Suijker; Yara L Blok; Ralph de Vries; Monique P van den Tol; Nicole M A Krekel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.