| Literature DB >> 21862913 |
Yoshitomo Ashitate1, Bernard T Lee, Long H Ngo, Rita G Laurence, Merlijn Hutteman, Rafiou Oketokoun, Elaine Lunsford, Hak Soo Choi, John V Frangioni.
Abstract
Preserving the nipple-areolar complex with a nipple-sparing mastectomy improves cosmesis compared with skin-sparing mastectomy. However, complications such as necrosis of the nipple-areolar complex significantly affect cosmetic outcome. Many factors influence nipple-areolar perfusion, and no consensus currently exists on optimal incisional choice. This study evaluates 2 nipple-sparing mastectomy incision models using near-infrared fluorescence to assess perfusion quantitatively. The periareolar and radial incisions were compared with 2 control models in Yorkshire pigs (N = 6). Methylene blue and indocyanine green were injected intravenously, and near-infrared fluorescence images were recorded at 3 time points: before surgery, immediately after (0 hour), and 3 days postoperatively. Contrast-to-background ratio was used to assess perfusion. At 72 hours, radial incisions showed a statistically significantly higher perfusion compared with periareolar incisions (P < 0.05). Based on our findings, radial incisions for nipple-sparing mastectomy may be preferable due to higher perfusion; however, clinical trials are necessary for further assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 21862913 PMCID: PMC3224668 DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f9af7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Plast Surg ISSN: 0148-7043 Impact factor: 1.539