Literature DB >> 20886299

Cancer survivors: familial risk perception and management advice given to their relatives.

Francois Eisinger1, Anne Deborah Bouhnik, Laetitia Malavolti, Anne Gaelle Le Corroller-Soriano, Claire Julian-Reynier.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe 2 years cancer survivors' perception of the cancer risk running in their family, and to describe how frequently these survivors recommended cancer screening to their relatives. A national cross-sectional survey was launched by the French Ministry of Health to investigate the living conditions of adult cancer patients 2 years after cancer diagnosis. Among the 13,923 patients identified, 6,957 were eligible to participate in this study and 4460 (64.1%) answered the questionnaire administered by telephone. One participant out of every two (50.8%) reported that they thought their relatives' risk of cancer was greater than that of the relatives of unaffected persons. Higher percentages were recorded among breast and colorectal cancer patients (65 and 65.1%, respectively), and lower percentages among those with lung and hematological cancer (34.9 and 28.4%, respectively). Overall, 61.1% of the participants had already advised relatives to undergo cancer screening and 10.4% planned to do so. Eighty-one percent of the participants with breast cancer and 76.3% of those with colorectal cancer said they had advised relatives to undergo screening. Lower percentages were obtained among patients with urinary tract (41.7%) and hematological malignancies (27.1%). Although patients' perceptions tend to fit the latest data on the frequency of cancer germline mutations, physicians should help their patients to convey more accurate advice to their families. If survivors were better informed, they could play a critical role by conveying relevant and sound risk reduction messages to their relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20886299     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-010-9390-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  16 in total

1.  An investigation of the effects of social desirability on the validity of self-reports of cancer screening behaviors.

Authors:  Timothy P Johnson; Diane P O'Rourke; Jane E Burris; Richard B Warnecke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Beliefs and interest in cancer risk in an underserved Latino cohort.

Authors:  Charité N Ricker; Sue Hiyama; Susan Fuentes; Nancy Feldman; Vasanth Kumar; Gwen C Uman; Raluca Nedelcu; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Inherited susceptibility to common cancers.

Authors:  William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Transparency in risk communication: graphical and analog tools.

Authors:  Elke Kurz-Milcke; Gerd Gigerenzer; Laura Martignon
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Hereditary breast cancer, circa 1750.

Authors:  F Eisinger; H Sobol; D Serin; J C Whorton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Frequency of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer among unselected patients with colorectal cancer in Germany.

Authors:  C Lamberti; E Mangold; C Pagenstecher; M Jungck; D Schwering; M Bollmann; J Vogel; D Kindermann; R Nikorowitsch; N Friedrichs; B Schneider; F Houshdaran; I G H Schmidt-Wolf; W Friedl; P Propping; T Sauerbruch; R Büttner; M Mathiak
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Population-based detection of Lynch syndrome in young colorectal cancer patients using microsatellite instability as the initial test.

Authors:  Lyn Schofield; Natasha Watson; Fabienne Grieu; Wei Qi Li; Nik Zeps; Jennet Harvey; Colin Stewart; Michael Abdo; Jack Goldblatt; Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The launch of Cancer Research UK's 'Reduce the Risk' campaign: baseline measurements of public awareness of cancer risk factors in 2004.

Authors:  Claudia Redeker; Jane Wardle; Deborah Wilder; Sara Hiom; Anne Miles
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland; Paul Hewitson; Ann McPherson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Robert Smith; H Meischke; D Bowen; N Urban
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of family history on psychosocial distress and perceived need for treatment in prostate cancer survivors.

Authors:  Andreas Dinkel; Marielouise Kornmayer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Birgitt Marten-Mittag; Peter Herschbach; Kathleen Herkommer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  "Cancer Survivors" as Voluntary Helpers in Cancer Associations in France. Limits of the Balance between Service Offer and Social Demand.

Authors:  Lionel Pourtau; Sabrine Taleb; Jean-Philippe De Oliveira; Mahasti Sagatchian; Dan Ferrand-Bechmann
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The KinFact intervention - a randomized controlled trial to increase family communication about cancer history.

Authors:  Joann N Bodurtha; Donna McClish; Maria Gyure; Rosalie Corona; Alexander H Krist; Vivian M Rodríguez; Alisa M Maibauer; Joseph Borzelleca; Deborah J Bowen; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.681

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.