Literature DB >> 30470978

The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Elif Temucin1, Nursen O Nahcivan2.   

Abstract

Although screening programs are known and recommended for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), the screening rates for the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy are very low among adult individuals. Navigation programs, also known as individualized counseling, have recently begun to be used for increasing screening rates. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the Nurse Navigation Program versus usual care on CRC screening participation and movement in stage of adoption for CRC screening and to examine perceived benefits of and barriers to CRC screening. This study was designed in line with a pre- and posttest two-group methodology. A total of 110 participants (55 nurse-navigated and 55 non-navigated patients) were studied. Data were collected using the following three tools: a sociodemographic information form, the Harvard Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool, and Instruments to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Benefits and Barriers. Following the Nurse Navigation Program, the FOBT (82 and 84%, respectively) and colonoscopy completion rates (15 and 22%, respectively) were significantly higher in the nurse-navigated group than in the non-navigated group at 3 and 6 months follow-up. Following the program, the benefit perceptions of the nurse-navigated group about CRC screening were improved, and their barrier perceptions were reduced. The results showed that the Nurse Navigation Program had significant effects on CRC screening behavior and health-related beliefs concerning CRC screening. Further assessment of the Nurse Navigation Program in different groups should be performed to observe its effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Colorectal cancer; Nurse navigation; Transtheoretical model

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30470978     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1448-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  72 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Debra J Holden; Daniel E Jonas; Deborah S Porterfield; Daniel Reuland; Russell Harris
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Briana Lawrence; Randy Elder; Shawna L Mercer; Katherine M Wilson; Barbara DeVinney; Stephanie Melillo; Michelle Carvalho; Stephen Taplin; Roshan Bastani; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Cathy Lee Melvin; Vicky Taylor; Maria Fernandez; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amy Duncan; Carlene Wilson; Stephen R Cole; Antonina Mikocka-Walus; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2009-04

5.  Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior?

Authors:  Aimee S James; Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening among African American primary care patients.

Authors:  Hsiao-Lan Wang; Shannon M Christy; Celette S Skinner; Victoria L Champion; Jeffrey K Springston; Susan M Perkins; Yan Tong; Connie Krier; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Richard W Grant; Alexander R Green; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Gloria Gamba; Sarah Oo; James M Richter; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Erratum: Family medicine model in Turkey: a qualitative assessment from the perspectives of primary care workers.

Authors:  Zeliha Asli Öcek; Meltem Çiçeklioğlu; Ummahan Yücel; Raziye Özdemir
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-09

10.  A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Elizabeth Medlin; Sandra Lisboa; Lisa Valley-Shah; Robert H Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  An investigation of efficient nursing interventions in early diagnosis of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Naghmeh A Larimi; Iran Belash; Maede Abedi; Parisa Bandari; Gohar Mousavi; Sepideh Ekhtiari; Fateme H Khademloo; Kosar Rahnamaei; Maryam Esmaeili Konari; Samieh Rahmdel; Elnaz Saripour
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-08-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.