Literature DB >> 25271975

Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.

Paul R Ward1, Cushla Coffey1, Sara Javanparast2, Carlene Wilson3, Samantha B Meyer4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the second highest cancer mortality rate in Australia. The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) aims to increase early detection of CRC by offering free Faecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT), although uptake is low for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) groups. AIM OF PAPER: To present data on trust and mistrust in the NBCSP by population groups with low uptake and thus to highlight areas in need of policy change.
METHODS: A qualitative study was undertaken in South Australia, involving interviews with 94 people from four CALD groups: Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian, and Indigenous peoples.
RESULTS: Our study highlights the complexities of institutional trust, which involves considerations of trust at interpersonal, local and national levels. In addition, trust and mistrust was found in more abstract systems such as the medical knowledge of doctors to diagnose or treat cancer or the scientific procedures in laboratories to test the FOBTs. The object of institutional (mis)trust differed between cultural groups - Anglo-Australian and Iranian groups indicated a high level of trust in the government, whereas Indigenous participants were much less trusting.
CONCLUSION: The level and nature of trust in the screening process varied between the CALD groups. Addressing program misconceptions, clarifying the FOBT capabilities and involving medical services in collecting and transporting the samples may increase trust in the NBCSP. However, broader and more enduring mistrust in services and institutions may need to be dealt with in order to increase trust and participation.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; colorectal cancer screening; culturally and linguistically diverse groups; mistrust; qualitative; trust

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25271975      PMCID: PMC5810636          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  23 in total

1.  Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.

Authors:  S R Cole; G P Young; D Byrne; J R Guy; J Morcom
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 2.  How equitable are colorectal cancer screening programs which include FOBTs? A review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sara Javanparast; Paul Ward; Graeme Young; Carlene Wilson; Stacy Carter; Gary Misan; Stephen Cole; Moyez Jiwa; George Tsourtos; Angelita Martini; Tiffany Gill; Genevieve Baratiny; Michelle Ah Matt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Demographic indicators of trust in federal, state and local government: implications for Australian health policy makers.

Authors:  Samantha B Meyer; Loreen Mamerow; Anne W Taylor; Julie Henderson; Paul R Ward; John Coveney
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Unwillingness to participate in colorectal cancer screening: examining fears, attitudes, and medical mistrust in an ethnically diverse sample of adults 50 years and older.

Authors:  Shalanda A Bynum; Jenna L Davis; B Lee Green; Ralph V Katz
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2012 May-Jun

5.  Predictors of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) completion among low-income adults.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Aimee S James; Wendi Born; Sandra Hall; Kimberly K Engelman; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?

Authors:  Aliki Christou; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland; Paul Hewitson; Ann McPherson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Reasons given by relatives of colorectal cancer patients for not undergoing screening.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Mary Jane Esplen; Vivek Goel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in different population subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia.

Authors:  Sara Javanparast; Paul R Ward; Stacy M Carter; Carlene J Wilson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; John Z Ayanian; Robert H Fletcher; Mary-Jo DelVecchio Good
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  5 in total

1.  Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Lynne B Klasko-Foster; Deborah O Erwin; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework.

Authors:  Tolib Mirzoev; Sumit Kane
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-10-31

3.  'Waiting for' and 'waiting in' public and private hospitals: a qualitative study of patient trust in South Australia.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Philippa Rokkas; Clinton Cenko; Mariastella Pulvirenti; Nicola Dean; A Simon Carney; Samantha Meyer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Improving Access to, Use of, and Outcomes from Public Health Programs: The Importance of Building and Maintaining Trust with Patients/Clients.

Authors:  Paul Russell Ward
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-03-08

5.  Patients' views on involving general practice in bowel cancer screening: a South Australian focus group study.

Authors:  Lynsey Brown; Cecilia Moretti; Leigh Roeger; Richard Reed
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.