Literature DB >> 18347859

Time-efficient laparoscopic skills assessment using an augmented-reality simulator.

J Adam Oostema1, Matthew P Abdel, Jon C Gould.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-based, virtual-reality laparoscopic surgical simulators have several advantages over traditional video trainers. One of these advantages is that performance can be evaluated using unique computer-derived metrics, which can be digitally archived for analysis at a time convenient to instructors. This study sought to determine whether the computer-derived metrics for a unique hybrid simulator correlated with laparoscopic surgical skill.
METHODS: For this study, 24 medical students (3rd year), 19 surgical residents (postgraduate years 1-5), and 3 attending surgeons were invited to perform four different tasks three times in a hybrid laparoscopic trainer (ProMIS). Instruction with minimal supervision occurred at a time convenient to each subject. The four tasks in order of complexity were laparoscopic orientation, object positioning, sharp dissection, and intracorporeal knot tying. The metrics automatically recorded were time, path length, and smoothness. The laparoscopic operative experience for each user was quantified using case logs.
RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation was observed between experience and performance for all three metrics for tasks 2 to 4 (p < 0.01). Smoothness was the only metric that correlated with the laparoscopic orientation task. Within tasks, time and smoothness correlated much more strongly with experience and to a similar degree. The strongest correlation was observed for the knot-tying task (r(2) = 0.60 for time and 0.59 smoothness).
CONCLUSIONS: The computer-derived metrics measured by the hybrid trainer correlate with laparoscopic experience. These metrics are automatically calculated and stored. This may make skills assessment and training a more time-efficient endeavor for instructors and trainees alike. Further study is necessary to determine whether specific metrics are better indicators of actual skill.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18347859     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9844-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill.

Authors:  S A Fraser; L S Feldman; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; D A McClusky; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  Elspeth M McDougall; Federico A Corica; John R Boker; Leandro G Sala; Gabriela Stoliar; James F Borin; Frank T Chu; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Construct validation of a novel hybrid surgical simulator.

Authors:  D Broe; P F Ridgway; S Johnson; S Tierney; K C Conlon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

8.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  D J Scott; W N Young; S T Tesfay; W H Frawley; R V Rege; D B Jones
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Building a laparoscopic surgical skills training laboratory: resources and support.

Authors:  Jon C Gould
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on a training simulator: what is the difference? A stepwise comparison of hand-assisted versus straight laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performance on an augmented reality simulator.

Authors:  Fabien Leblanc; Conor P Delaney; Clyde N Ellis; Paul C Neary; Bradley J Champagne; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Resident training in minimally invasive surgery: a survey of Canadian department and division chairs.

Authors:  Beverley Chan; Guillaume Martel; Eric C Poulin; Joseph Mamazza; Robin P Boushey
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Virtual reality does not meet expectations in a pilot study on multimodal laparoscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Vasile V Bintintan; Tobias Gehrig; Hannes G Kenngott; Lars Fischer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Motaz Alyafi; Tomonori Hada; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Characteristics predicting laparoscopic skill in medical students: nine years' experience in a single center.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nomura; Takeshi Matsutani; Nobutoshi Hagiwara; Itsuo Fujita; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Yoshikazu Kanazawa; Hiroshi Makino; Yasuhiro Mamada; Terumichi Fujikura; Masao Miyashita; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Is motion analysis a valid tool for assessing laparoscopic skill?

Authors:  John D Mason; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A novel augmented reality simulator for skills assessment in minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Smailis; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Validation of the PASSPORT V2 training environment for arthroscopic skills.

Authors:  J J Stunt; G M M J Kerkhoffs; T Horeman; C N van Dijk; G J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Single versus multimodality training basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Willem M Brinkman; Sanne Y Havermans; Sonja N Buzink; Sanne M B I Botden; Jack J Jakimowicz; Benedictus C Schoot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kevin S Tang; Derrick L Cheng; Eric Mi; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2020-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.