Literature DB >> 1834014

Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

M J Rybak1, E M Bailey, V N Reddy.   

Abstract

A teicoplanin fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) developed by International BioClinical (IBC) was evaluated by using serum samples from patients who had been receiving teicoplanin at Detroit Receiving Hospital (DRH) as part of a clinical investigation. Patient samples collected over a 1-year span were assayed at DRH and at IBC, and the results were compared with those of a standard microbiological assay performed at Merrell Dow Research Institute, Indianapolis, Ind. The FPIA has a rapid turnaround time (circa 20 min), utilizes small sample volumes (less than 100 microliters) and is sensitive and accurate in determining concentrations in the range of 5 to 100 micrograms/ml. The intra-assay and interassay coefficient of variation for controls (7, 35, and 75 micrograms/ml) was less than or equal to 13%. Concentrations greater than 100 micrograms/ml must be diluted prior to the assay, which may introduce additional error in determination. The FPIA compared well with the bioassay (r = 0.901) for 193 clinical samples. The results obtained utilizing the FPIA system were reproducible at two different sites, as illustrated by the high degree of correlation between the results at DRH and IBC (r = 0.92). There was less than 7% interference noted when teicoplanin was assayed in the presence of other antibiotics. Patient samples stored for up to 1 year retained their potency: the mean recovery rate in these samples was 107%. The FPIA should be useful for monitoring and adjusting teicoplanin dosage regimens in patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834014      PMCID: PMC245223          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.35.8.1586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  Bioassay of teicoplanin in serum containing rifampin or a beta-lactam antibiotic.

Authors:  M T Kenny; J K Dulworth; M A Brackman; H L Torney; C B Gibson; A R Hildebrand; L S Weckbach; J L Staneck
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  HPLC quantitation of the six main components of teicoplanin in biological fluids.

Authors:  F Jehl; H Monteil; A Tarral
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Determination of teicoplanin concentrations in serum by high-pressure liquid chromatography.

Authors:  B Joos; R Lüthy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Verbist; B Tjandramaga; B Hendrickx; A Van Hecken; P Van Melle; R Verbesselt; J Verhaegen; P J De Schepper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Fluorescence polarization immunoassay for the determination of therapeutic drug levels in human plasma.

Authors:  M E Jolley
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Failure of treatment with teicoplanin at 6 milligrams/kilogram/day in patients with Staphylococcus aureus intravascular infection. The Infectious Diseases Consortium of Oregon.

Authors:  D N Gilbert; C A Wood; R C Kimbrough
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics in intravenous drug abusers being treated for bacterial endocarditis.

Authors:  M J Rybak; S A Lerner; D P Levine; L M Albrecht; P L McNeil; G A Thompson; M T Kenny; L Yuh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  A sensitive bioassay for teicoplanin in serum in the presence or absence of other antibiotics.

Authors:  R C Erickson; A R Hildebrand; P F Hoffman; C B Gibson
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Teicoplanin in the treatment of infection caused by gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  A H Williams; R N Grüneberg; A Webster; G L Ridgway
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin for therapy of severe infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Y Glupczynski; H Lagast; P Van der Auwera; J P Thys; F Crokaert; E Yourassowsky; F Meunier-Carpentier; J Klastersky; J P Kains; E Serruys-Schoutens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Evaluation of a novel fluorescence polarization immunoassay for teicoplanin.

Authors:  H Cox; M Whitby; G Nimmo; G Williams
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Efficacy of linezolid against methicillin-resistant or vancomycin-insensitive Staphylococcus aureus in a model of hematogenous pulmonary infection.

Authors:  Katsunori Yanagihara; Yukihiro Kaneko; Toyomitsu Sawai; Yoshitsugu Miyazaki; Kazuhiro Tsukamoto; Yoichi Hirakata; Kazunori Tomono; Jun-Ichi Kadota; Takayoshi Tashiro; Ikuo Murata; Shigeru Kohno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Absence of "red man syndrome" in patients being treated with vancomycin or high-dose teicoplanin.

Authors:  M J Rybak; E M Bailey; L H Warbasse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effects of DQ-113, a new quinolone, against methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-caused hematogenous pulmonary infections in mice.

Authors:  Yukihiro Kaneko; Katsunori Yanagihara; Yoshitsugu Miyazaki; Kazuhiro Tsukamoto; Yoichi Hirakata; Kazunori Tomono; Jun-ichi Kadota; Takayoshi Tashiro; Ikuo Murata; Shigeru Kohno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Teicoplanin and daptomycin bactericidal activities in the presence of albumin or serum under controlled conditions of pH and ionized calcium.

Authors:  K C Lamp; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Bactericidal activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and in combination against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of endocarditis.

Authors:  B J McGrath; S L Kang; G W Kaatz; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.