Literature DB >> 1384423

Absence of "red man syndrome" in patients being treated with vancomycin or high-dose teicoplanin.

M J Rybak1, E M Bailey, L H Warbasse.   

Abstract

Twenty-five febrile patients with a history of intravenous drug use who were receiving either vancomycin (15 patients) or teicoplanin (10 patients) as part of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, clinical efficacy trial were enrolled, upon receipt of their first dose of antibiotic, into a study to evaluate the effect of 1 g of vancomycin and high-dose teicoplanin (30 mg/kg of body weight) on histamine release and the occurrence of "red man syndrome" (RMS). In addition, 10 healthy volunteer subjects (HVS) were randomized to receive either 1 g of vancomycin intravenously or a saline infusion in a double-blind, crossover design study. Patients and HVS were observed for the presence of erythema, flushing, pruritus, and hypotension during and for up to 1 h postinfusion by a blinded investigator. Histamine concentrations in plasma were measured at baseline and during and after drug infusion. No significant differences were noted in baseline temperature between patients (vancomycin recipients, 102.3 degrees F [39.1 degrees C]; teicoplanin recipients, 102.4 degrees F [39.1 degrees C]) or incidence of bacteremia (7 of 15 vancomycin recipients; 5 of 10 teicoplanin recipients). There were no significant differences in peak vancomycin concentrations in the sera of patients (40.8 micrograms/ml) and HVS (49.9 micrograms/ml). There were no reactions consistent with RMS in any patient who received teicoplanin (0 of 10); there was a significant difference in the occurrence of RMS in patients in comparison with that in HVS (0 of 15 patients, 9 of 10 HVS; P less than 0.001) who received vancomycin. The predominant reaction was erythema and pruritus. Histamine concentrations in plasma and the area under the histamine plasma concentration-time curve were highly variable within groups and were not statistically different between patients and HVS. The incidence of RMS secondary to vancomycin or teicoplanin in our patient population appears to be low and consistent with clinical observations. Similar to previous investigations, RMS secondary to vancomycin in HVS was high (90%). However, we found no relationship between the histamine concentration in plasma or the area under the plasma histamine concentration-time curve and the severity of RMS in HVS. The reason for the discrepancy of RMS in patients versus that in HVS in unknown, but it may be related to a blunted effect of glycopeptides to produce the reaction in the presence of infection or it may be specific to our patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1384423      PMCID: PMC190318          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.36.6.1204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

2.  Red man syndrome with teicoplanin.

Authors:  S Dubettier; A Boibieux; M Lagable; L Crevon; D Peyramond; H Milon
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug

3.  Severe reaction to vancomycin not mediated by histamine release and documented by rechallenge.

Authors:  J V Sahai; R E Polk; L B Schwartz; D P Healy; E H Westin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Vancomycin and the "red man's syndrome".

Authors:  J C Garrelts; J D Peterie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Vancomycin, red neck syndrome, and fits.

Authors:  G R Bailie; R Yu; R Morton; S Waldek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Histamine release by narcotics and muscle relaxants in humans.

Authors:  J Moss; C E Rosow
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  "Red-neck syndrome" with slow infusion of vancomycin.

Authors:  A K Pau; R Khakoo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Hazards of rapid administration of vancomycin.

Authors:  P Newfield; M F Roizen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparison of vancomycin- and teicoplanin-induced histamine release and "red man syndrome".

Authors:  J Sahai; D P Healy; M J Shelton; J S Miller; S J Ruberg; R Polk
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Red man syndrome: incidence, etiology, and prophylaxis.

Authors:  M R Wallace; J R Mascola; E C Oldfield
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Teicoplanin. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of gram-positive infections.

Authors:  C M Spencer; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Comparative Study of Teicoplanin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia.

Authors:  C Y Liu; W S Lee; C P Fung; N C Cheng; C L Liu; S P Yang; S L Chen
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  The study of vancomycin use and its adverse reactions associated to patients of a Brazilian university hospital.

Authors:  Daniel Savignon Marinho; Gisele Huf; Bruno L A Ferreira; Helena Castro; Carlos R Rodrigues; Valeria Pereira de Sousa; Lúcio M Cabral
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-07-15

4.  Defining risk factors for red man syndrome in children and adults.

Authors:  Angela L Myers; Andrea Gaedigk; Hongying Dai; Laura P James; Bridgette L Jones; Kathleen A Neville
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuli Svetitsky; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Vancomycin skin tests and prediction of "red man syndrome" in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R E Polk; D Israel; J Wang; J Venitz; J Miller; J Stotka
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Glycopeptide Hypersensitivity and Adverse Reactions.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Nicola A Clayton; Kimberly H Welker
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 9.  Regulation of Resistance in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: The VanRS Two-Component System.

Authors:  Alexandra A Guffey; Patrick J Loll
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-09-25

Review 10.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in the Framework of Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Consensus Review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Kazuaki Matsumoto; Kazutaka Oda; Kensuke Shoji; Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Satoshi Fujii; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Toshihiko Mayumi; Takashi Ueda; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.321

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.