Literature DB >> 2942100

Clinical evaluation of teicoplanin for therapy of severe infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Y Glupczynski, H Lagast, P Van der Auwera, J P Thys, F Crokaert, E Yourassowsky, F Meunier-Carpentier, J Klastersky, J P Kains, E Serruys-Schoutens.   

Abstract

Teicoplanin was evaluated in 47 patients with severe infections, including 14 patients with bone infections, 11 patients with soft-tissue infections, 7 patients with endocarditis, 5 patients with pneumonia, 3 patients with septic thrombophlebitis, 3 patients with septicemia of unknown origin, and 4 patients with miscellaneous infections. Overall, bacteremia was documented in 24 patients. The pathogens isolated were 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus (including 8 methicillin-resistant strains), 4 strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, 4 strains of Streptococcus faecalis, 2 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 5 strains of other streptococci, and 1 Micrococcus luteus strain. A total of 22 patients (46.8%) were clinically cured, 8 patients (17.0%) improved, 2 patients (4.3%) had relapses after initial improvement, and 15 patients (31.9%) failed to respond. The results were better in nonbacteremic patients (19 of 23 patients [82.6%] were cured or improved) than in patients with bacteremia (12 of 24 patients [50%] were cured or improved). Bacteriological cure occurred in 25 patients (53.2%), and superinfections were documented in 6 patients (12.8%). No major adverse effects were observed. We conclude that teicoplanin is a potentially effective and well-tolerated antimicrobial agent for therapy of nonbacteremic infections caused by gram-positive bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2942100      PMCID: PMC180363          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.29.1.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  18 in total

1.  Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens.

Authors:  J V Bennett; J L Brodie; E J Benner; W M Kirby
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-03

2.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  In vitro activity and human pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  L Verbist; B Tjandramaga; B Hendrickx; A Van Hecken; P Van Melle; R Verbesselt; J Verhaegen; P J De Schepper
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Teicoplanin versus nafcillin and vancomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H F Chambers; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparative in vitro study of teichomycin A2.

Authors:  V Fainstein; B LeBlanc; G P Bodey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro activity of teichomycin and vancomycin alone and in combination with rifampin.

Authors:  P E Varaldo; E Debbia; G C Schito
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro activity of teichomycin A 2 in comparison with penicillin and vancomycin against gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; C Petermüller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Comparative in vitro activities of teichomycin and other antibiotics against JK diphtheroids.

Authors:  L Jadeja; V Fainstein; B LeBlanc; G P Bodey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Teichomycin: in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation in comparison with other antibiotics.

Authors:  R Pallanza; M Berti; B P Goldstein; E Mapelli; E Randisi; R Scotti; V Arioli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Clinical study of combination therapy with oxacillin and rifampin for staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  P Van der Auwera; F Meunier-Carpentier; J Klastersky
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Antibacterial activities and modes of action of vancomycin and related glycopeptides.

Authors:  R Nagarajan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical efficacy of teicoplanin.

Authors:  P Calain; F Waldvogel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effects of dosage, peak and trough concentrations in serum, protein binding, and bactericidal rate on efficacy of teicoplanin in a rabbit model of endocarditis.

Authors:  H F Chambers; S Kennedy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: detection methods and treatment of infections.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in critically ill patients with various degrees of renal impairment.

Authors:  Y Domart; C Pierre; B Clair; J J Garaud; B Regnier; C Gibert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  A40926, a new glycopeptide antibiotic with anti-Neisseria activity.

Authors:  B P Goldstein; E Selva; L Gastaldo; M Berti; R Pallanza; F Ripamonti; P Ferrari; M Denaro; V Arioli; G Cassani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Effects of the new glycopeptide antibiotic teicoplanin on platelet function and blood coagulation.

Authors:  G Agnelli; M Longetti; R Guerciolini; F Menichetti; S Grasselli; F Boldrini; G Bucaneve; G G Nenci; A Del Favero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Teicoplanin: 10 years of clinical experience.

Authors:  M Trautmann; H Wiedeck; M Ruhnke; M Oethinger; R Marre
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Treatment of 112 bone and joint infections with teicoplanin.

Authors:  V Dacquet; F Biron; D Gontier; G Choquet-Kasylevsky; A Niwiczka; I Harding; C Atlani; D Peyramond
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1996-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.