Literature DB >> 18333131

A novel approach to the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen.

Mahmoud A Khalifa1, Vlad Maksymov, Corwyn H Rowsell, Sherif Hanna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) margins examined intraoperatively or the technical protocol for frozen section examination. The aim of this work was to summarize our experience regarding the intraoperative examination of the uncinate margin and to compare it with the published literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our local protocol for the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the PD specimen is described in this article. A PubMed search limited to English language publications using terms along the theme of pancreaticoduodenectomy and margin was performed. Retrieved articles were categorized according to whether they discussed frozen section margin examination.
RESULTS: Ten articles published between 1981 and 2005 were retrieved which discussed the intraoperative examination of PD specimens. Of the 10 articles, 5 discussed the intraoperative consultation for diagnostic purposes only, 2 discussed the consultation for both diagnostic purposes and assessment of margins, and 3 discussed intraoperative assessment of margins only. Of the total of five articles that discussed the intraoperative assessment of margins, none detailed the technical protocol for examining the uncinate margin. DISCUSSION: Our proposed protocol for the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of PD specimens allows for its accurate evaluation and has not been described previously in the English literature.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18333131      PMCID: PMC2020790          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701278273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct cancer: an analysis of 55 patients concerning the significance of ductal and radial margins.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Tomoo Kosuge; Kazuaki Shimada; Tsuyoshi Sano; Hidenori Ojima; Junji Yamamoto; Susumu Yamasaki; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Frozen section examination of liver, gallbladder, and pancreas.

Authors:  Juan Lechago
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Pancreas head carcinoma: frequency of invasion to soft tissue adherent to the superior mesenteric artery.

Authors:  Masahiro Noto; Koichi Miwa; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Masato Kayahara; Hiroyuki Takamura; Koichi Shimizu; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  The number of metastatic lymph nodes in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Seung-Mo Hong; HyungJun Cho; Ok-Jun Lee; Jae Y Ro
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens.

Authors:  C A Staley; K R Cleary; J L Abbruzzese; J E Lee; F C Ames; C J Fenoglio; D B Evans
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy.

Authors:  Gauri R Varadhachary; Eric P Tamm; James L Abbruzzese; Henry Q Xiong; Christopher H Crane; Huamin Wang; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Frozen section diagnosis in tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  L H Weiland
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Frozen section diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective study of 64 biopsies.

Authors:  C Hyland; S M Kheir; M B Kashlan
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Intraoperative pancreatic biopsy--a diagnostic dilemma.

Authors:  M Witz; Z Shkolnik; A Dinbar
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Analysis of pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P H O'Brien; K H Mincey
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative assessment of the Whipple resection specimen.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Improved lymph node retrieval in Whipple specimens as a result of implementation of a new uncinate margin protocol.

Authors:  Corwyn H Rowsell; Sherif Hanna; Eugene Hsieh; Calvin Law; Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa; Vlad Maksymov; Corwyn Rowsell
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Caroline S Verbeke; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting.

Authors:  Munita Bal; Swapnil Rane; Sanjay Talole; Mukta Ramadwar; Kedar Deodhar; Prachi Patil; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh Shrikhande
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Surgical margins for duodenopancreatectomy.

Authors:  R Coppola; M Cartillone; D Borzomati; G Nappo; S Valeri; T Petitti; G Perrone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-10-25

7.  An anatomical-based mapping analysis of the pancreaticoduodenectomy retroperitoneal margin highlights the urgent need for standardized assessment.

Authors:  Vlad Maksymov; Michael Hogan; Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  The Role of Pathological Method and Clearance Definition for the Evaluation of Margin Status after Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Cancer. Results of a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Gennaro Nappo; Domenico Borzomati; Alessandro Zerbi; Paola Spaggiari; Ugo Boggi; Daniela Campani; Sławomir Mrowiec; Łukasz Liszka; Alessandro Coppola; Michela Amato; Tommasangelo Petitti; Fabio Vistoli; Marco Montorsi; Giuseppe Perrone; Roberto Coppola; Damiano Caputo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Predictive factors for long-term survival after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Making a case for standardized reporting of the resection margin using certified cancer center data.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Dennis Obonyo; Verena Nicole Uslar; Ingo Stricker; Andrea Tannapfel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.