Literature DB >> 19718354

Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Caroline S Verbeke1, Krishna V Menon.   

Abstract

Curative resection is crucial to survival in pancreatic cancer; however, despite optimization and standardization of surgical procedures, this is not always achieved. This review highlights that the rates of microscopic margin involvement (R1) vary markedly between studies and, although resection margin status is believed to be a key prognostic factor, the rates of margin involvement and local tumour recurrence or overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients are often incongruent. Recent studies indicate that the discrepancy between margin status and clinical outcome is caused by frequent underreporting of microscopic margin involvement. Lack of standardization of pathological examination, confusing nomenclature and controversy regarding the definition of microscopic margin involvement have resulted in the wide variation of reported R1 rates that precludes meaningful comparison of data and clinicopathological correlation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; pancreas; pathology; resection margin

Year:  2009        PMID: 19718354      PMCID: PMC2727080          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00055.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  54 in total

Review 1.  Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet?

Authors:  C S Verbeke
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa; Vlad Maksymov; Corwyn Rowsell
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Verbeke; D Leitch; K V Menon; M J McMahon; P J Guillou; A Anthoney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  External and intraoperative radiotherapy for resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancer: analysis of survival rates and complications.

Authors:  Y Nishimura; R Hosotani; Y Shibamoto; M Kokubo; S Kanamori; K Sasai; M Hiraoka; G Ohshio; M Imamura; M Takahashi; M Abe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Prognostic factors associated with resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  K W Millikan; D J Deziel; J C Silverstein; T M Kanjo; J D Christein; A Doolas; R A Prinz
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Surgical management of neoplasms of the ampulla of Vater: local resection or pancreatoduodenectomy and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; N T van Heek; K F D Kuhlmann; O R C Busch; G J A Offerhaus; T M van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.

Authors:  S Pedrazzoli; V DiCarlo; R Dionigi; F Mosca; P Pederzoli; C Pasquali; G Klöppel; K Dhaene; F Michelassi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prognostic factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region.

Authors:  J H Allema; M E Reinders; T M van Gulik; M J Koelemay; D J Van Leeuwen; L T de Wit; D J Gouma; H Obertop
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  M K Diener; C Heukaufer; G Schwarzer; C M Seiler; G Antes; M W Buchler; H P Knaebel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

10.  Usefulness of follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  Laurence Chiche; Barbara Alkofer; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Vincent Rouleau; Ephrem Salamé; Guy Samama; Philippe Segol
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  61 in total

1.  Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bor-Uei Shyr; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of Resection Margin Status in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: a National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christof Kaltenmeier; Ibrahim Nassour; Richard S Hoehn; Sidrah Khan; Alison Althans; David A Geller; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer Zureikat; Samer Tohme
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Can post-hoc video review of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy predict portal/superior mesenteric vein margin status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Jae P Jung; Mazen S Zenati; Ahmad Hamad; Melissa E Hogg; Richard L Simmons; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Brian A Boone
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Computed tomography-based diagnostics might be insufficient in the determination of pancreatic cancer unresectability.

Authors:  Vyacheslav I Egorov; Roman V Petrov; Elena N Solodinina; Gregory G Karmazanovsky; Natalia S Starostina; Natalia A Kuruschkina
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-27

5.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  Shahid G Farid; Gavin A Falk; Daniel Joyce; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Andrew M Smith; Gareth Morris-Stiff
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: surgical results, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Salvatore Paiella; Valentina Allegrini; Marco Ramera; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Giuseppe Malleo; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Pathologic Evaluation and Reporting of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas and Other Tumoral Intraepithelial Neoplasms of Pancreatobiliary Tract: Recommendations of Verona Consensus Meeting.

Authors:  Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  New challenges in perioperative management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Puleo; Raphaël Maréchal; Pieter Demetter; Maria-Antonietta Bali; Annabelle Calomme; Jean Closset; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Jacques Deviere; Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  [R1 resection for pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  G F Weber; S Kersting; F Haller; R Grützmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.