Literature DB >> 19066952

Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist.

Mahmoud A Khalifa1, Vlad Maksymov, Corwyn Rowsell.   

Abstract

Surgical margin status of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen is an independent predictor of survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Although most surgical pathologists are familiar with the protocols for grossing and evaluation of the various margins of the specimen, the currently prevailing definitions of the retroperitoneal surgical margin minimize the fact that this margin is actually a combination of surfaces of different anatomical structures. The unfamiliarity with its detailed anatomy often creates communication gaps when the pathologic findings are presented to other members of the multidisciplinary team. The following discussion is the collective opinion of hepato-pancreato-biliary pathologists in two tertiary care Canadian medical centers in this field. It describes the authors' proposed nomenclature and landmarks for anatomic mapping of the retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy resected specimen. Increasing familiarity with the subtleties of the retroperitoneal margin is expected to improve communication and sets the stage for future quality improvement initiatives and translational research in the multidisciplinary setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19066952     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-008-0711-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  21 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic head mass: what can be done? Classification: the pathological point of view.

Authors:  G Zamboni; P Capelli; A Pesci; S Beghelli; J Lüttges; G Klöppel
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2000-09

2.  Clinical significance of combined pancreas and portal vein resection in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masanori Aramaki; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Tetsuya Ishio; Yoshihisa Himeno; Atsushi Sasaki; Kazuhiro Yada; Katsunori Kawano; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

Review 3.  Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric-portal vein resection: report of 32 cases.

Authors:  Guang-Wen Zhou; Wei-Ding Wu; Wei-Dong Xiao; Hong-Wei Li; Cheng-Hong Peng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer--are we there yet?

Authors:  C S Verbeke
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections.

Authors:  Irene Esposito; Jörg Kleeff; Frank Bergmann; Caroline Reiser; Esther Herpel; Helmut Friess; Peter Schirmacher; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Verbeke; D Leitch; K V Menon; M J McMahon; P J Guillou; A Anthoney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens.

Authors:  C A Staley; K R Cleary; J L Abbruzzese; J E Lee; F C Ames; C J Fenoglio; D B Evans
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prognostic factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic head region.

Authors:  J H Allema; M E Reinders; T M van Gulik; M J Koelemay; D J Van Leeuwen; L T de Wit; D J Gouma; H Obertop
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Donghui Li; Keping Xie; Robert Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

1.  Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Caroline S Verbeke; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Whipple made simple for surgical pathologists: orientation, dissection, and sampling of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens for a more practical and accurate evaluation of pancreatic, distal common bile duct, and ampullary tumors.

Authors:  N Volkan Adsay; Olca Basturk; Burcu Saka; Pelin Bagci; Denizhan Ozdemir; Serdar Balci; Juan M Sarmiento; David A Kooby; Charles Staley; Shishir K Maithel; Rhonda Everett; Jeanette D Cheng; Duangpeng Thirabanjasak; Donald W Weaver
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  Pathology handling of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens: Approaches and controversies.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Gómez-Mateo; Luis Sabater-Ortí; Antonio Ferrández-Izquierdo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Tumour origin and R1 rates in pancreatic resections: towards consilience in pathology reporting.

Authors:  Munita Bal; Swapnil Rane; Sanjay Talole; Mukta Ramadwar; Kedar Deodhar; Prachi Patil; Mahesh Goel; Shailesh Shrikhande
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Nipun B Merchant; Steven Brower; Megan Branda; Mitchell C Posner; L William Traverso; Ross A Abrams; Vincent J Picozzi; Peter W T Pisters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Peripancreatic fat invasion is an independent predictor of poor outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nigel Balfour Jamieson; Alan K Foulis; Karin A Oien; Euan J Dickson; Clem W Imrie; Ross Carter; Colin J McKay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Collins; M Bloomston
Journal:  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol       Date:  2009-12

8.  An anatomical-based mapping analysis of the pancreaticoduodenectomy retroperitoneal margin highlights the urgent need for standardized assessment.

Authors:  Vlad Maksymov; Michael Hogan; Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Towards a More Standardized Approach to Pathologic Reporting of Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimens for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Cross-continental and Cross-specialty Survey From the Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society Grossing Working Group.

Authors:  Deepti Dhall; Jiaqi Shi; Daniela S Allende; Kee-Taek Jang; Olca Basturk; Volkan Adsay; Grace E Kim
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.298

10.  Predictive factors for long-term survival after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Making a case for standardized reporting of the resection margin using certified cancer center data.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Dennis Obonyo; Verena Nicole Uslar; Ingo Stricker; Andrea Tannapfel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.