Literature DB >> 18345324

Improved lymph node retrieval in Whipple specimens as a result of implementation of a new uncinate margin protocol.

Corwyn H Rowsell1, Sherif Hanna, Eugene Hsieh, Calvin Law, Mahmoud A Khalifa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node status is an important prognostic factor in pancreatic and peri-ampullary adenocarcinoma. We recently changed our protocol for assessment of the uncinate margin of Whipple specimens and noted that lymph nodes were often present in uncinate margin sections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whipple specimens from 2004 to 2006 were divided into two groups, those that were handled according to the en face protocol, and those handled according to the radial protocol. The numbers of lymph nodes found in uncinate margin sections were assessed, as well as the total number of nodes found in the specimen.
RESULTS: Sixteen cases were handled according to the en face protocol, and 20 according to the radial protocol. In the en face group, 2 benign nodes were found in the uncinate margin (0.1 nodes per case), while in the radial group, 36 nodes (1.8 nodes per case) were identified (p=0.0005). Eight cases in the latter group had positive nodes in the uncinate margin sections. In two of these cases the positive lymph node was the only lymph node with metastasis, and in an additional case the involved node was one of two positive lymph nodes. Total lymph node retrieval was 15.5 lymph nodes per case in the en face group, and 20 nodes per case in the radial group (p=0.02). DISCUSSION: The improved lymph node retrieval may be due to additional nodes found in radial sections of the uncinate margin, or alternatively, due to increased vigilance in specimen handling. In 3 of 20 cases, nodes found in the radial sections influenced staging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Whipple specimens; lymph node retrieval; uncinate margin

Year:  2007        PMID: 18345324      PMCID: PMC2225518          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701646206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  15 in total

1.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Long-term quality of life following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Colette M Shaw; Deirdre M O'Hanlon; Gerry P McEntee
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 May-Jun

Review 3.  Intraoperative assessment of the Whipple resection specimen.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: factors influencing long-term survival of 127 patients with resection.

Authors:  Qi-Lu Qiao; Yi-Guo Zhao; Mu-Lin Ye; Yin-Mo Yang; Jian-Xun Zhao; Yan-Ting Huang; Yuan-Lian Wan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Is pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for chronic pancreatitis masquerading as periampullary tumor?

Authors:  Yi-Ming Shyr; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

6.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors.

Authors:  P U Heitz; M Kasper; J M Polak; G Klöppel
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Islet cell tumors of the pancreas: pathologic-imaging correlation among size, necrosis and cysts, calcification, malignant behavior, and functional status.

Authors:  P C Buetow; T V Parrino; J L Buck; L Pantongrag-Brown; P R Ros; A H Dachman; D F Cruess
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned.

Authors:  Verne L Hoshal; Mary B Benedict; Lisa R David; Jennifer Kulick
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Management of nonfunctioning islet cell tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  P F Dial; J W Braasch; R L Rossi; A K Lee; G L Jin
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.

Authors:  C J Yeo; T A Sohn; J L Cameron; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist.

Authors:  Mahmoud A Khalifa; Vlad Maksymov; Corwyn Rowsell
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Use of staplers to divide the pancreas during pancreatoduodenectomy: is it justified?

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Ganesh Nagarajan; Savio G Barretto
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Comparison of Pathological Radicality between Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Palanivelu Chinnusamy; Alwar Ramanujam; Srivatsan Gurumurthy Sivakumar; Anand Vijai Natesan; C Chandramaliteeswaran; Praveen Raj Palanivelu; Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan; Rajapandian Subbiah
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-04

4.  Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.

Authors:  Marek Sierzega; Łukasz Bobrzyński; Andrzej Matyja; Jan Kulig
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.754

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.