Literature DB >> 18333096

Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Frances Tse1, Jeffrey S Barkun, Joseph Romagnuolo, Gad Friedman, Jeffrey D Bornstein, Alan N Barkun.   

Abstract

Evaluation of suspected biliary tract obstruction is a common clinical problem. Clinical data such as history, physical examination, and laboratory tests can accurately identify up to 90% of patients whose jaundice is caused by extrahepatic obstruction. However, complete assessment of extrahepatic obstruction often requires the use of various imaging modalities to confirm the presence, level, and cause of obstruction, and to aid in treatment plan. In the present summary, the literature on competing technologies including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiopancreatography (PTC), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), helical CT (hCT) and helical CT cholangiography (hCTC) with regards to diagnostic performance characteristics, technical success, safety, and cost-effectiveness is reviewed. Patients with obstructive jaundice secondary to choledocholithiasis or pancreaticobiliary malignancies are the primary focus of this review. Algorithms for the management of suspected obstructive jaundice are put forward based on current evidence. Published data suggest an increasing role for EUS and other noninvasive imaging techniques such as MRCP, and hCT following an initial transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of patients with suspected biliary obstruction to select candidates for surgery or therapeutic ERCP. The management of patients with a suspected pancreaticobiliary condition ultimately is dependent on local expertise, availability, cost, and the multidisciplinary collaboration between radiologists, surgeons, and gastroenterologists.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18333096      PMCID: PMC2020758          DOI: 10.1080/13651820600746867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  253 in total

1.  The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.

Authors:  P Katsinelos; I Galanis; I Pilpilidis; G Paroutoglou; P Tsolkas; B Papaziogas; S Dimiropoulos; E Kamperis; D Katsiba; M Kalomenopoulou; A Papagiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Sgourakis; K Karaliotas
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP.

Authors:  A V Sahai; P D Mauldin; V Marsi; R H Hawes; B J Hoffman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Relative merits of ultrasonography, computed tomography and cholangiography in patients of surgical obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  M Kumar; R Prashad; A Kumar; R Sharma; S K Acharya; T K Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

5.  Assessment of pancreatic parenchymal invasion by bile duct cancer using intraductal ultrasonography.

Authors:  K Tamada; N Ueno; M Ichiyama; T Tomiyama; T Nishizono; S Wada; A Oohashi; S Tano; T Aizawa; K Ido; K Kimura
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.

Authors:  M F Graham; P L Cooperberg; M M Cohen; H J Burhenne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C D Becker; M Grossholz; M Becker; G Mentha; R de Peyer; F Terrier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

Authors:  F Prat; B Meduri; B Ducot; R Chiche; R Salimbeni-Bartolini; G Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery: a comparison of sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  J Shawn Mallery; Barbara A Centeno; Peter F Hahn; YuChiao Chang; Andrew L Warshaw; William R Brugge
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Computer aided diagnosis of jaundice. A comparison of two data bases.

Authors:  G Lindberg; A Björkman; R P Knill-Jones
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1987
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the investigation of obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  J Addley; R M Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

2.  Common bile duct stones - their presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Rajendra Desai; Bahaman N Shokouhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Management of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Decision Analysis for Choosing the Optimal Imaging Modality.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg; Brintha K Enestvedt; Gennadiy Bakis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  For biliary dilatation, a negative endosonography needs additional image studies in weight loss suggesting malignancy.

Authors:  Chien-Hua Chen; Chi-Chieh Yang; Yung-Hsiang Yeh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Encapsulation Approaches for In-Stent Wireless Magnetoelastic Sensors.

Authors:  Jiqing Jiang; Ramprasad Mohanan Nambisan; Scott Green; Yogesh B Gianchandani
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Is MRCP equivalent to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction in orthotopic liver transplant recipients? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Jorgensen; Akbar K Waljee; Michael L Volk; Christopher J Sonnenday; Grace H Elta; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Amit G Singal; Jason R Taylor; B Joseph Elmunzer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Noninvasive Imaging of the Biliary System Relevant to Percutaneous Interventions.

Authors:  Stephen Thomas; Kayleen Jahangir
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Percutaneous imaging-guided interventions for acute biliary disorders in high surgical risk patients.

Authors:  Ragab Hani Donkol; Nahed Abdel Latif; Khaled Moghazy
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-28

9.  Feasibility and yield of screening in relatives from familial pancreatic cancer families.

Authors:  Emmy Ludwig; Sara H Olson; Sharon Bayuga; Jennifer Simon; Mark A Schattner; Hans Gerdes; Peter J Allen; William R Jarnagin; Robert C Kurtz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ming-Hsun Yang; Tien-Hua Chen; Shin-E Wang; Yi-Fang Tsai; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.