Literature DB >> 12915970

The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.

P Katsinelos1, I Galanis, I Pilpilidis, G Paroutoglou, P Tsolkas, B Papaziogas, S Dimiropoulos, E Kamperis, D Katsiba, M Kalomenopoulou, A Papagiannis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting is often used for large or difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, but the effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on size or fragmentation of stones after long-term treatment with biliary stenting has not been formally established. We compared the stone size or fragmentation of common bile duct stones after a long period of biliary stenting.
METHODS: Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis was performed for 49 high-risk patients with CBD stones too large or difficult to be extracted by conventional endoscopic means. Bile duct drainage was established in all the patients without complications. Of the patients, 24 died with endoprosthesis in situ all from causes unrelated to biliar disease; 22 underwent a second and three patients a third attempt at stone extraction. The largest stone diameter was >12 mm in all patients.
RESULTS: In 11 of 25 patients (44%) the endoprosthesis allowed resolution of the problem of unextractable common bile duct stones. Four patients showed no existence of stent, and ERCP complete stone clearance from the CBD on programmized appointment after endoprosthesis insertion. Reduced size or fragmentation of stones was obtained in seven patients, and the stones could be removed endoscopically. The remaining 14 patients demonstrated no significant change in the size or fragmentation of their stones, and endoprostheses were replaced.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that endoscopic endoprosthesis for large or difficult CBD stones is an effective method to clear the duct in selected cases, as well as an important definitive treatment in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12915970     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9240-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Stenting or surgery for treatment of irretrievable common bile duct calculi in elderly patients?

Authors:  G D De Palma; C Catanzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Management of bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Sherman; R H Hawes; G A Lehman
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.115

3.  Endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis in elderly patients with large bile duct stones: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  W Van Steenbergen; W Pelemans; J Fevery
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D Vaira; L D'Anna; C Ainley; J Dowsett; S Williams; J Baillie; S Cairns; J Croker; P Salmon; P Cotton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm. A light and electron microscopy study.

Authors:  A G Speer; P B Cotton; J Rode; A M Seddon; C R Neal; J Holton; J W Costerton
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Bacteriological and electron microscopy examination of brown pigment stones.

Authors:  J W Leung; J Y Sung; J W Costerton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Chemical composition of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M J Whiting; J M Watts
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Biliary endoprostheses for the management of retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J H Siegel; R P Yatto
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement in the management of large common bile duct stones.

Authors:  P Navicharern; M Rhodes; D Flook; B Lawrie
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  15 in total

1.  Failure of sequential biliary stenting for unsuccessful common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-16

2.  Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.

Authors:  Wafi Attaallah; Asim Cingi; Sakir Karpuz; Mehmet Karakus; Omer Gunal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Stent Patency and Migration Rate of Different Shaped Plastic Stents in Bile Flow Phantom Model and In Vivo Animal Bile Duct Dilation Model.

Authors:  Chang-Il Kwon; Gwangil Kim; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee; Kyoung Ah Kim; Kwang Hyun Ko; Joo Young Cho; Sung Pyo Hong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Endoscopic Stents for the Biliary Tree and Pancreas.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Mahendran Jayaraj; Richard Kozarek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09

5.  Endoscopic biliary stenting in irretrievable common bile duct stones: stent exchange or expectant management-tertiary-centre experience and systematic review.

Authors:  Noor Mohammed; Matthew Pinder; Keith Harris; Simon M Everett
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-22

6.  Long-term effects of forgotten biliary stents: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Mehmet Odabasi; Cem Arslan; Sami Akbulut; Haci Hasan Abuoglu; Erkan Ozkan; Mehmet Kamil Yildiz; Cengiz Eris; Emre Gunay; Kemal Tekesin; Tolga Muftuoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

7.  Oldest biliary endoprosthesis in situ.

Authors:  Pierluigi Consolo; Giuseppe Scalisi; Stefano F Crinò; Andrea Tortora; Giuseppa Giacobbe; Marcello Cintolo; Luigi Familiari; Socrate Pallio
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-07-16

8.  Difficult bile duct stones.

Authors:  Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04

9.  Permanent stenting in "unextractable" common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents.

Authors:  Franco Pisello; Girolamo Geraci; Francesco Li Volsi; Giuseppe Modica; Carmelo Sciumè
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.