Literature DB >> 18330596

Social desirability in the measuring of patient satisfaction after treatment of coloproctologic disorders: on shortcomings of general bipolar satisfaction scales for quality management.

Gerald D Giebel1, Norbert Groeben.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Within the field of medicine, much attention is being paid to quality management, whereby patient satisfaction plays a major role. In order to measure this construct, usually rather general, bipolar rating scales are applied. However, these scales are often susceptible to social desirability biases. PATIENTS-
METHODS: Coloproctological patients were asked to complete a questionnaire with ratings of satisfaction and anxiety at two different points of measurement: One group while in treatment (N = 86) and a second group approximately 1 year after their treatment (N = 328).
RESULTS: Even when controlling for relevant demographic influences, a clear decrease in intensity of the evaluation ratings is shown when the survey was administered 1 year after release from hospital as compared to during the patients' stay in hospital. For generally formulated scales of patient satisfaction, social desirability constitutes a significant bias.
CONCLUSION: The usual conceptualization of a bipolar continuum of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction must be renounced. Instead, questionnaires might be constructed in three steps which investigate problem dimensions at a medium level of concreteness. Only in this way can quality management gain credibility and trust within as well as beyond the field of medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18330596     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0310-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  26 in total

1.  Getting to the truth? Researching user views of primary health care.

Authors:  Helen Schneider; Natasha Palmer
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.344

2.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The role of emotions in health care satisfaction. Positive feelings have the expected effect, but negative ones do not always result in dissatisfaction.

Authors:  L Dubé; M C Bélanger; E Trudeau
Journal:  J Health Care Mark       Date:  1996

Review 4.  Unpacking the concept of patient satisfaction: a feminist analysis.

Authors:  Sheila A Turris
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Patients' evaluations of the quality of care: influencing factors and the importance of engagement.

Authors:  Sophie H Staniszewska; Lorna Henderson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Patient satisfaction and research-related problems (Part 2). Is triangulation the answer?

Authors:  K Hyrkäs; M Paunonen
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Towards a conceptual framework of lay evaluation of health care.

Authors:  M Calnan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The critical incident technique: a new approach to the assessment of clinical performance.

Authors:  D I Newble
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Investigation of the ways in which patients' reports of their satisfaction with healthcare are constructed.

Authors:  Carol Edwards; Sophie Staniszweska; Nicola Crichton
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  A national evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes in open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney; Lobat Hashemi; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  "Tendency to excuse" and patient satisfaction of those suffering with breast cancer.

Authors:  Sabine Davoll; Christoph Kowalski; Kathrin Kuhr; Oliver Ommen; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Quality of care and emotional support from the inpatient cancer patient's perspective.

Authors:  S Singer; H Götze; C Möbius; H Witzigmann; R-D Kortmann; A Lehmann; M Höckel; R Schwarz; J Hauss
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lise M Verhoef; Tom H Van de Belt; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Lisette Schoonhoven; Rudolf B Kool
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Needs and concerns of transgender individuals regarding interdisciplinary transgender healthcare: A non-clinical online survey.

Authors:  Jana Eyssel; Andreas Koehler; Arne Dekker; Susanne Sehner; Timo O Nieder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.