BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction and emotional support are crucial elements of cancer care. Little is known, however, about which areas of care are important from the patient's perspective and the roles emotional distress and support play in this context. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study was conducted (n = 396 cancer patients; t1 = after admission to hospital, t2 = before discharge). Quality of care was measured with the quality of care from the patient's perspective questionnaire, and emotional distress was measured with the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Additional questions regarding emotional support wished (at t1) and provided (at t2) were administered. RESULTS: The patients reported that the domains of care most important to them were as follows: respect and commitment of the physicians, information before procedures, care equipment, and medical care. The areas where improvements are most obviously needed were nutrition, participation, clarity about who is responsible for personal care, and having the possibility of speaking in private with nurses and psycho-oncologists. Fifty-six percent of the patients were highly emotionally distressed, 84% wanted support from physicians, 76% from nurses, 33% from psychologists, and 7% from a pastor. CONCLUSION: Emotional support is a crucial part of patient satisfaction and should be provided by several members of the oncological team, especially the patients' physicians. In turn, it is crucial that medical professionals be equipped with good communication skills.
BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction and emotional support are crucial elements of cancer care. Little is known, however, about which areas of care are important from the patient's perspective and the roles emotional distress and support play in this context. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study was conducted (n = 396 cancerpatients; t1 = after admission to hospital, t2 = before discharge). Quality of care was measured with the quality of care from the patient's perspective questionnaire, and emotional distress was measured with the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Additional questions regarding emotional support wished (at t1) and provided (at t2) were administered. RESULTS: The patients reported that the domains of care most important to them were as follows: respect and commitment of the physicians, information before procedures, care equipment, and medical care. The areas where improvements are most obviously needed were nutrition, participation, clarity about who is responsible for personal care, and having the possibility of speaking in private with nurses and psycho-oncologists. Fifty-six percent of the patients were highly emotionally distressed, 84% wanted support from physicians, 76% from nurses, 33% from psychologists, and 7% from a pastor. CONCLUSION: Emotional support is a crucial part of patient satisfaction and should be provided by several members of the oncological team, especially the patients' physicians. In turn, it is crucial that medical professionals be equipped with good communication skills.
Authors: Bodil Wilde Larsson; Gerry Larsson; Marie Wickman Chantereau; Karin Staël von Holstein Journal: Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv Date: 2005
Authors: Susanne Singer; Julia Roick; Jürgen Meixensberger; Franziska Schiefke; Susanne Briest; Andreas Dietz; Kirsten Papsdorf; Joachim Mössner; Thomas Berg; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Dietger Niederwieser; Annette Keller; Anette Kersting; Helge Danker Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Johannes Huber; Andreas Ihrig; Wolfgang Herzog; Christian G Huber; Beryl Konyango; Eva Löser; Gencay Hatiboglu; Boris A Hadaschik; Sascha Pahernik; Markus Hohenfellner Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Anna Beraldi; Ene Kukk; Alexandra Nest; Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle; Jutta Engel; Pia Heußner; Peter Herschbach Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kerstin Hermelink; Henrik Höhn; Stephan Hasmüller; Julia Gallwas; Kristin Härtl; Rachel Würstlein; Janna Köhm Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Flora Tzelepis; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Douglas Joshua; Mariko L Carey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hannah Voß; Peter Scholz-Kreisel; Christoph Richter; Florian Ringel; Susanne Singer; Mirjam Renovanz Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-01-31 Impact factor: 4.147