Literature DB >> 15713185

Patients' evaluations of the quality of care: influencing factors and the importance of engagement.

Sophie H Staniszewska1, Lorna Henderson.   

Abstract

AIMS: This paper reports a study exploring the process of patient evaluation and identifying the factors which influence this.
BACKGROUND: Patient experiences of health care have become a central focus for researchers, policymakers, clinicians and patient groups in many countries. While surveys of patient experiences have become increasingly common internationally, concerns about the validity of concepts such as satisfaction have cast doubt on the utility of their findings. These concerns reflect our limited understanding of patient evaluation and the factors that can influence this process.
METHODS: A qualitative design was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with a sample of outpatients in their homes in one county in England. In total, 41 patients participated in the study and were interviewed before their appointment. Of these patients, 37 were interviewed again after their appointment. Six of the latter were then re-interviewed 6 weeks after the appointment to explore whether evaluations had changed.
FINDINGS: Patient evaluation was influenced by a number of factors, including gratitude, faith, loyalty, luck and equity. The overall effect was to prompt positive evaluation, even when care was poor. These factors should be accounted for in the interpretation of patient experiences surveys. Patient experiences were further influenced by their sense of engagement with the system. A negative sense of engagement could have a major impact on the patient, resulting in disappointment or fear and a desire to leave the health care system, and in a negative evaluation of a specific aspect of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Engagement may provide a more appropriate indicator of negative experience than dissatisfaction. The influence of these factors should be considered in future attempts to develop more sensitive and appropriate methods of eliciting patient experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15713185     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03326.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines in context of evidence.

Authors:  Eeva Ketola; Minna Kaila; Mari Honkanen
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08

2.  Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Angie Docherty; Carol Bugge; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of women receiving in-patient postnatal care in one English maternity unit.

Authors:  Sarah Beake; Val Rose; Debra Bick; Annette Weavers; Julie Wray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Social desirability in the measuring of patient satisfaction after treatment of coloproctologic disorders: on shortcomings of general bipolar satisfaction scales for quality management.

Authors:  Gerald D Giebel; Norbert Groeben
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Early discharge following hip arthroplasty: patients' acceptance masks doubts and concerns.

Authors:  Gillian R Hunt; George M Hall; Burra V S Murthy; Seamus O'Brien; David Beverland; Martin C Lynch; Peter Salmon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Classification of patients based on their evaluation of hospital outcomes: cluster analysis following a national survey in Norway.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Kjersti Eeg Skudal; Hilde Hestad Iversen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Item generation in the development of an inpatient experience questionnaire: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eliza L Y Wong; Angela Coulter; Annie W L Cheung; Carrie H K Yam; Eng-Kiong Yeoh; Sian Griffiths
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  The patient's experience of the psychosocial process that influences identity following stroke rehabilitation: a metaethnography.

Authors:  E Hole; B Stubbs; C Roskell; A Soundy
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-28

9.  Public assessment of key performance indicators of healthcare in a Canadian province: the effect of age and chronic health problems.

Authors:  Abu Sadat Nurullah; Herbert C Northcott; Michael D Harvey
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-15

10.  Critical views on postpartum care expressed by new mothers.

Authors:  Ann Rudman; Ulla Waldenström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.