Literature DB >> 18329836

An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.

A Ignatov1, O Hoffman, B Smith, J Fahlke, B Peters, J Bischoff, S-D Costa.   

Abstract

AIMS: We wanted to assess the factors that predict complications and patient satisfaction of totally implanted central venous access ports (TIAP).
METHODS: We reviewed 550 patients with breast or gynaecological malignancies who had initial port placement for chemotherapy between 1995 and 2006. We retrospectively assessed all TIAP complications, port duration and follow-up care until the TIAPs were removed (or the last known recorded documentation) or until the death of the patient. TIAP-related patient satisfaction was also assessed via a questionnaire-based survey of 356 patients.
RESULTS: 561 TIAPs were placed in 550 cancer patients (11 patients received 2 TIAPs during the study period); the median time of port duration was 22.5 months. There were 104 complications in this group. Of these, 81 occurred during chemotherapy treatment that lasted a median time of 182 days. Removal secondary to complication was observed in 48 cases. TIAPs placed on the left chest side, through the subclavian vein or with the catheter tip localized in the peripheral part of superior vena cava demonstrated the highest incidence of complications. Patients with a BMI >28.75 had an increased risk for developing complications. Our follow-up questionnaire revealed a 93% patient satisfaction rate with the TIAP.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with left-sided ports, catheter tips lying in the upper part of the superior vena cava and implantation via the subclavian vein are at a higher risk for TIAP-associated complications. Being excessively overweight was assessed as another risk factor for developing complications. TIAPs are highly accepted and further recommended by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18329836     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  38 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Inadvertent port: catheter placement in azygos vein.

Authors:  K Harish; Y C Madhu
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-06

3.  Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.

Authors:  G S Patel; K Jain; R Kumar; A H Strickland; L Pellegrini; J Slavotinek; M Eaton; W McLeay; T Price; M Ly; S Ullah; B Koczwara; G Kichenadasse; C S Karapetis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Provider Differences in Use of Implanted Ports in Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Elena B Elkin; Coral L Atoria; Camelia S Sima; Andrew S Epstein; Victoria Blinder; Kent A Sepkowitz; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  [Indications, technique and complications of port implantation].

Authors:  L Haeder; J Jähne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Adriana Toro; Simonetta Pozzi; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  A retrospective clinical study: complications of totally implanted central venous access ports.

Authors:  June Pill Seok; Young Jin Kim; Hyun Min Cho; Han Young Ryu; Wan Jin Hwang; Tae Yun Sung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.