Literature DB >> 23801104

[Indications, technique and complications of port implantation].

L Haeder1, J Jähne.   

Abstract

Implanted central venous access devices are becoming increasingly more important in oncology as an important tool for therapists and patients. As an intracorporeal system with reduced risk of infection compared to percutaneous tunnelled catheters they ensure a permanent and safe access to the central venous system. However, they can be associated with risks and sometimes severe complications which should not be underestimated so that planning and performance of the implantation require a high level of care and attention. Postoperative care and the correct allocation of all groups of persons involved in the therapy can reduce complication rates and are thus of prognostic relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23801104     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-012-2408-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  35 in total

1.  [Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients].

Authors:  M Lenhart; S Schätzler; C Manke; M Strotzer; J Seitz; J Gmeinwieser; M Völk; N Zorger; S Feuerbach; T Herold; C Paetzel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2009-06-17

Review 2.  Use of vancomycin-containing lock or flush solutions for prevention of bloodstream infection associated with central venous access devices: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Catheter-related thrombosis: risks, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Michael L Linenberger
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in totally implantable venous access device placement: results of a single-center prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Hasan Karanlik; Sidika Kurul; Pinar Saip; Ersin Selcuk Unal; Fatma Sen; Rian Disci; Erkan Topuz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous catheters: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew D Mitchell; Barbara Jo Anderson; Kendal Williams; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 6.  Systemic anticoagulant prophylaxis for central catheter-associated venous thrombosis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Chan; Andrea Iannucci; William E Dager
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Christel Fontaine; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Johan De Mey; Gerrit Ponnet; Chris Oost; Jan Lamote; Jacques De Greve; Benjamin Van Camp; Patrick Lacor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Infectious complications of indwelling long-term central venous catheters.

Authors:  D E Clarke; T A Raffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Reasons for explantation of totally implantable access ports: a multivariate analysis of 385 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Phillip Knebel; Steffen Schröder; Thomas Bruckner; Markus K Diener; Roland Hennes; Klaus Buhl; Bruno Schmied; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  [Prevention of catheter-induced thromboses by low molecular weight heparins].

Authors:  Ch Lersch
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.