Literature DB >> 18327650

Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Hanna Kokko1, Katja Heubel.   

Abstract

The lek paradox states that maintaining genetic variation necessary for 'indirect benefit' models of female choice is difficult, and two interrelated solutions have been proposed. 'Genic capture' assumes condition-dependence of sexual traits, while genotype-by-environment interactions (GEIs) offer an additional way to maintain diversity. However, condition-dependence, particularly with GEIs, implies that environmental variation can blur the relationship between male displays and offspring fitness. These issues have been treated separately in the past. Here we combine them in a population genetic model, and show that predictions change not only in magnitude but also in direction when the timing of dispersal between environments relative to the life cycle is changed. GEIs can dramatically improve the evolution of costly female preferences, but also hamper it if much dispersal occurs between the life history stage where condition is determined and mating. This situation also arises if selection or mutation rates are too high. In general, our results highlight that when evaluating any mechanism promoted as a potential resolution of the lek paradox, it is not sufficient to focus on its effects on genetic variation. It also has to be assessed to what extent the proposed mechanism blurs the association between male attractiveness and offspring fitness; the net balance of these two effects can be positive or negative, and often strongly context-dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18327650     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-008-9249-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  25 in total

1.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies.

Authors:  P David; T Bjorksten; K Fowler; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration.

Authors:  S R Proulx
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  K A Hughes; F H Rodd; D N Reznick
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Female soldier beetles display a flexible preference for selectively favored male phenotypes.

Authors:  Denson Kelly McLain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions; Anne Houde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.

Authors:  Suzanne C Mills; Rauno V Alatalo; Esa Koskela; Johanna Mappes; Tapio Mappes; Tuula A Oksanen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Luke Holman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Winners have higher pre-copulatory mating success but losers have better post-copulatory outcomes.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Reuven Dukas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Females can solve the problem of low signal reliability by assessing multiple male traits.

Authors:  Abigail K Wegehaupt; William E Wagner
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex genetic divergence as a bet-hedging strategy in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  Melissa L Evans; Mélanie Dionne; Kristina M Miller; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Genotype-by-environment interactions for female mate choice of male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Fiona C Ingleby; John Hunt; David J Hosken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Phillip Gienapp; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The role of genetic diversity in the evolution and maintenance of environmentally-cued, male alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  K A Stewart; R Draaijer; M R Kolasa; I M Smallegange
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Contrasting patterns of sexually selected traits in Mediterranean and continental populations of European mouflon.

Authors:  Krešimir Kavčić; Luca Corlatti; Toni Safner; Nikola Budak; Nikica Šprem
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Genetic and environmental variation in transcriptional expression of seminal fluid proteins.

Authors:  Bahar Patlar; Michael Weber; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna Maria Skwierzyńska; Kasper Hlebowicz; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.