Literature DB >> 11831656

Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration.

S R Proulx1.   

Abstract

Species that exist in heterogeneous environments experience selection for specialization that is opposed by the homogenizing forces of migration and recombination. Migration tends to reduce associations between alleles and habitats, whereas recombination tends to break down associations among loci. The idea that heterogeneity should favor the evolution of isolating mechanisms has motivated evolutionary studies of reduced migration, habitat preference, and assortative mating. However, costly female choice of high-quality males can also evolve in heterogeneous populations and is not hindered by either recombination or migration. When information on male fitness is available through indicator traits, female choice based on these traits increases associations between female choice alleles and locally adapted alleles. Not only does female choice evolve in a heterogeneous environment, it acts to enhance the level of genetic variation and is thus self-reinforcing. The amount of female choice at equilibrium depends on how well mixed the habitats are, how much information on male genotype is available, and how different the habitats are. Female choice reaches the highest levels for intermediate levels of heterogeneity, because at such levels of heterogeneity there is both a high risk and high cost of mismating.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11831656     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00755.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Older males signal more reliably.

Authors:  Stephen R Proulx; Troy Day; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Strong spatial population structure shapes the temporal coevolutionary dynamics of costly female preference and male display.

Authors:  Maximilian Tschol; Jane M Reid; Greta Bocedi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Franz J Weissing; Pim Edelaar; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Experience matters: females use smell to select experienced males for paternal care.

Authors:  Nichola Fletcher; Ellen J Storey; Magnus Johnson; Donald J Reish; Jörg D Hardege
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Howard D Rundle; Anders Odeen; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Migration-selection balance at multiple Loci and selection on dominance and recombination.

Authors:  Alexey Yanchukov; Stephen R Proulx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.