Literature DB >> 30150223

Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.

Xiang-Yi Li1, Luke Holman2.   

Abstract

In many species, females are hypothesized to obtain 'good genes' for their offspring by mating with males in good condition. However, female preferences might deplete genetic variance and make choice redundant. Additionally, high-condition males sometimes produce low-fitness offspring, for example because of environmental turnover and gene-by-environment interactions (GEIs) for fitness, or because fit males carry sexually antagonistic alleles causing them to produce unfit daughters. Here, we extend previous theory by investigating the evolution of female mate choice in a spatially explicit evolutionary simulation implementing both GEIs and intralocus sexual conflict (IASC), under sex-specific hard or soft selection. We show that IASC can weaken female preferences for high-condition males or even cause a preference for males in low condition, depending on the relative benefits of producing well-adapted sons versus daughters, which in turn depends on the relative hardness of selection on males and females. We discuss the relevance of our results to conservation genetics and empirical evolutionary biology.This article is part of the theme issue 'Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEI and GxE; environmental stochasticity; lek paradox; local adaptation; mate preference; sexual antagonism

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30150223      PMCID: PMC6125721          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  32 in total

Review 1.  Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals.

Authors:  T von Schantz; S Bensch; M Grahn; D Hasselquist; H Wittzell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Costs and benefits of evolving under experimentally enforced polyandry or monogamy.

Authors:  Oliver Y Martin; David J Hosken
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Contrasting effects of intralocus sexual conflict on sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Freek J H de Haas; Edward H Morrow; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition-dependent mate choice.

Authors:  T Veen; S P Otto
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Evolution under monogamy feminizes gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; David Houle; Zheng Yan; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles.

Authors:  David Berger; Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Karl Grieshop; Martin I Lind; Alexei A Maklakov; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The effects of stress and sex on selection, genetic covariance, and the evolutionary response.

Authors:  L Holman; F Jacomb
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Ines K Häderer; Marc J Lajeunesse; Nils Anthes
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Strong spatial population structure shapes the temporal coevolutionary dynamics of costly female preference and male display.

Authors:  Maximilian Tschol; Jane M Reid; Greta Bocedi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  On the role of sex differences for evolution in heterogeneous and changing fitness landscapes: insights from pygmy grasshoppers.

Authors:  Anders Forsman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Direct and indirect selection on mate choice during pollen competition: Effects of male and female sexual traits on offspring performance following two-donor crosses.

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Henrik G Smith; Stefan Andersson; Åsa Lankinen
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Coevolution of female fidelity and male help in populations with alternative reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Andrew Morozov; Wolfgang Goymann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Effects of Delayed Mating on the Reproductive Performance of Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).

Authors:  Ya-Ling Wang; Qi-Nian Jin; Xiang-Ping Wang
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.