Literature DB >> 15696753

Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions.

Emma Hine1, Stephen F Chenoweth, Mark W Blows.   

Abstract

Single male sexually selected traits have been found to exhibit substantial genetic variance, even though natural and sexual selection are predicted to deplete genetic variance in these traits. We tested whether genetic variance in multiple male display traits of Drosophila serrata was maintained under field conditions. A breeding design involving 300 field-reared males and their laboratory-reared offspring allowed the estimation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix for six male cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) under field conditions. Despite individual CHCs displaying substantial genetic variance under field conditions, the vast majority of genetic variance in CHCs was not closely associated with the direction of sexual selection measured on field phenotypes. Relative concentrations of three CHCs correlated positively with body size in the field, but not under laboratory conditions, suggesting condition-dependent expression of CHCs under field conditions. Therefore condition dependence may not maintain genetic variance in preferred combinations of male CHCs under field conditions, suggesting that the large mutational target supplied by the evolution of condition dependence may not provide a solution to the lek paradox in this species. Sustained sexual selection may be adequate to deplete genetic variance in the direction of selection, perhaps as a consequence of the low rate of favorable mutations expected in multiple trait systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15696753     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01627.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  38 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Samyukta Jagadeesh; Nancy Stepek; Reza Azanchi; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neutral evolution of multiple quantitative characters: a genealogical approach.

Authors:  Cortland K Griswold; Benjamin Logsdon; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 6.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.