Literature DB >> 18326693

Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3.

Heather A Anderson1, Gloria Hentz, Adrian Glasser, Karla K Stuebing, Ruth E Manny.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guidelines for predicting accommodative amplitude by age are often based on subjective push-up test data that overestimate the accommodative response. Studies in which objective measurements were used have defined expected amplitudes for adults, but expected amplitudes for children remain unknown. In this study, objective methods were used to measure accommodative amplitude in a wide age range of individuals, to define the relationship of amplitude and age from age 3.
METHODS: Accommodative responses were measured in 140 subjects aged 3 to 40 years. Measurements were taken with the Grand Seiko autorefractor (RyuSyo Industrial Co., Ltd., Kagawa, Japan) as the subjects viewed a high-contrast target at 33 cm through minus lenses of increasing power until the responses showed no further increase in accommodation.
RESULTS: The maximum accommodative amplitude of each subject was plotted by age, and a curvilinear function fit to the data: y = 7.33 - 0.0035(age - 3)(2) (P < 0.001). Tangent analysis of the fit indicated that the accommodative amplitude remained relatively stable until age 20. Data from this study were then pooled with objective amplitudes from previous studies of adults up to age 70. A sigmoidal function was fit to the data: y = 7.083/(1 + e([0.2031(age-36.2)-0.6109])) (P < 0.001). The sigmoidal function indicated relatively stable amplitudes below age 20 years, a rapid linear decline between 20 and 50 years, and a taper to 0 beyond 50 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that accommodative amplitude decreases in a curvilinear manner from 3 to 40 years. When combined with data from previous studies, a sigmoidal function describes the overall trend throughout life with the biggest decrease occurring between 20 and 50 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18326693      PMCID: PMC2730890          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  21 in total

1.  The amplitude of accommodation in presbyopia.

Authors:  D HAMASAKI; J ONG; E MARG
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1956-01

2.  Studies in Monocular and Binocular Accommodation, with Their Clinical Application.

Authors:  A Duane
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1922

3.  Objective accommodation measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Lisa A Ostrin; Sanjeev Kasthurirangan; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  An inner city preschool visual screening programme: long-term visual results.

Authors:  R J Bowman; T H Williamson; R G Andrews; T C Aitchison; G N Dutton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Tonic accommodation, accommodative hysteresis, and refractive error.

Authors:  S K Fisher; K J Ciuffreda; S Levine
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-11

6.  The spectacle amplitude of accommodation of children aged six to ten.

Authors:  R M Wold
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1967-10

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  New visual acuity test for pre-school children.

Authors:  L Hyvärinen; R Näsänen; P Laurinen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-08

9.  Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude.

Authors:  Jon E Wold; Annie Hu; Stephanie Chen; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Prevalence of myopia in the United States.

Authors:  R D Sperduto; D Seigel; J Roberts; M Rowland
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-03
View more
  30 in total

1.  Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ruth E Manny; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Association between axial length and in vivo human crystalline lens biometry during accommodation: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Takuhei Shoji; Naoko Kato; Sho Ishikawa; Hisashi Ibuki; Norihiro Yamada; Itaru Kimura; Kei Shinoda
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Prediction of accommodative optical response in prepresbyopic subjects using ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Viswanathan Ramasubramanian; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Age-dependence of the optomechanical responses of ex vivo human lenses from India and the USA, and the force required to produce these in a lens stretcher: the similarity to in vivo disaccommodation.

Authors:  Robert C Augusteyn; Ashik Mohamed; Derek Nankivil; Pesala Veerendranath; Esdras Arrieta; Mukesh Taneja; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Loraine T Sinnott; Mark A Bullimore; Peter A Wassenaar; Petra Schmalbrock; Chiu-Yen Kao; Samuel Patz; Donald O Mutti; Adrian Glasser; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Study on accommodation by autorefraction and dynamic refraction in children.

Authors:  Prabhakar Srinivasapur Krishnacharya
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-08-15

8.  Finite element modelling of radial lentotomy cuts to improve the accommodation performance of the human lens.

Authors:  H J Burd; G S Wilde
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Is emmetropia the natural endpoint for human refractive development? An analysis of population-based data from the refractive error study in children (RESC).

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Kathryn A Rose; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Attention and Visual Motor Integration in Young Children with Uncorrected Hyperopia.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Maureen Maguire; Maxwell Pistilli; T Rowan Candy; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn; Lynn Cyert; Bruce Moore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.