Literature DB >> 19958289

Is emmetropia the natural endpoint for human refractive development? An analysis of population-based data from the refractive error study in children (RESC).

Ian G Morgan1, Kathryn A Rose, Leon B Ellwein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the natural end-point for refractive development during childhood.
METHODS: Cycloplegic (1% cyclopentolate) autorefraction was performed on 38, 811 children aged 5 and 15 in population-based samples at eight sites in the Refractive Error Study in Children (RESC). Refractions (right eye) were categorized as myopic (≤-0.5 D), emmetropic (>-0.5 to ≤+0.5 D), mildly hyperopic (>+0.5 to ≤+2.0 D and hyperopic (>+2.0 D).
RESULTS: At five sites (Jhapa - rural Nepal, New Delhi - urban India, Mahabubnagar - rural India, Durban - semi-urban South Africa and La Florida - urban Chile), there was <20% myopia by age 15. Mild hyperopia was the most prevalent category at all ages, except for Mahabubnagar where emmetropia became the marginally most prevalent category at ages 14 and 15. At the other sites (Gombak - semi-urban Malaysia, Shunyi - semi-rural China and Guangzhou - urban China), there was substantial (>35%) myopia by age 15. At these sites, mild hyperopia was the most prevalent category during early childhood, and myopia became the predominant category later. In Gombak district and Guangzhou, emmetropia was a minor category at all ages, with myopia increasing as mild hyperopia decreased. In Shunyi district, emmetropia was the most prevalent category over the ages 11-14.
CONCLUSION: Emmetropia was not the predominant outcome for refractive development in children. Instead, populations were predominantly mildly hyperopic or substantial amounts of myopia appeared in them. This suggests that mild hyperopia is the natural state of refractive development in children and that emmetropia during childhood carries the risk of subsequent progression to myopia.
© 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2009 Acta Ophthalmol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19958289      PMCID: PMC2891782          DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01800.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  42 in total

1.  Vision, visual acuity, and ocular refraction of young men: findings in a sample of 1,033 subjects.

Authors:  A SORSBY; M SHERIDAN; G A LEARY; B BENJAMIN
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1960-05-07

Review 2.  To emmetropize or not to emmetropize? The question for hyperopic development.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  The sclera and myopia.

Authors:  Jody A Summers Rada; Setareh Shelton; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Changes in ocular refraction and its components among medical students--a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  L L Lin; Y F Shih; Y C Lee; P T Hung; P K Hou
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia.

Authors:  Pik-Pin Goh; Yahya Abqariyah; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Refractive error in children in a rural population in India.

Authors:  Rakhi Dandona; Lalit Dandona; Marmamula Srinivas; Prashant Sahare; Saggam Narsaiah; Sergio R Muñoz; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Refractive errors and incident cataracts: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  T Y Wong; B E Klein; R Klein; S C Tomany; K E Lee
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children.

Authors:  M Dirani; L Tong; G Gazzard; X Zhang; A Chia; T L Young; K A Rose; P Mitchell; S-M Saw
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Changes in refraction over 10 years in an adult population: the Beaver Dam Eye study.

Authors:  Kristine E Lee; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Refractive error and visual impairment in African children in South Africa.

Authors:  Kovin S Naidoo; Avesh Raghunandan; Khathutshelo P Mashige; Pirindhavellie Govender; Brien A Holden; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  25 in total

1.  Refractive error study in young subjects: results from a rural area in Paraguay.

Authors:  Isabel Signes-Soler; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel Angel Estrella Lumeras; Elena Tomás Verduras; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Nature and nurture: the complex genetics of myopia and refractive error.

Authors:  R Wojciechowski
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Insight from OPN1LW Gene Haplotypes into the Cause and Prevention of Myopia.

Authors:  Maureen Neitz; Melissa Wagner-Schuman; Jessica S Rowlan; James A Kuchenbecker; Jay Neitz
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Accelerated loss of crystalline lens power initiating from emmetropia among young school children: a 2-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Shuyu Xiong; Xiangui He; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Jianfeng Zhu; Jingjing Wang; Bo Zhang; Haidong Zou; Xun Xu
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  Macular edema in Asian Indian premature infants with retinopathy of prematurity: Impact on visual acuity and refractive status after 1-year.

Authors:  Anand Vinekar; Shwetha Mangalesh; Chaitra Jayadev; Noel Bauer; Sivakumar Munusamy; Vasudha Kemmanu; Mathew Kurian; Padmamalini Mahendradas; Kavitha Avadhani; Bhujang Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Assessment of Macular Parameter Changes in Patients with Keratoconus Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Srujana Sahebjada; Fakir M Amirul Islam; Sanj Wickremasinghe; Mark Daniell; Paul N Baird
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Refractive errors in 3-6 year-old Chinese children: a very low prevalence of myopia?

Authors:  Weizhong Lan; Feng Zhao; Lixia Lin; Zhen Li; Junwen Zeng; Zhikuan Yang; Ian G Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of premyopia and myopia in Chinese preschool children: a longitudinal cohort.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Rui Li; Dan Huang; Xiao Lin; Hui Zhu; Yue Wang; Xiaoyan Zhao; Xiaohan Zhang; Hu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Is myopia a public health problem in India?

Authors:  Rohit Saxena; Praveen Vashist; Vimla Menon
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2013-04

10.  Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study.

Authors:  Jian Feng Wu; Hong Sheng Bi; Shu Mei Wang; Yuan Yuan Hu; Hui Wu; Wei Sun; Tai Liang Lu; Xing Rong Wang; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.