Literature DB >> 3425675

Tonic accommodation, accommodative hysteresis, and refractive error.

S K Fisher1, K J Ciuffreda, S Levine.   

Abstract

Accommodative hysteresis was compared in high myopes, low myopes, emmetropes, and hyperopes. Subjects consisted of 48 visually normal young adults who were fully corrected for their ametropia and equally distributed among the four refractive categories. Baseline measures of tonic accommodation, nearpoint, and farpoint were followed by a 10 min period of monocular fixation on a target which provided a stimulus equal to the subject's accommodative amplitude. The tonic measures were repeated immediately after fixation and were followed by either reassessment of the nearpoint and farpoint, or a 20 min period in darkness with reassessment of the tonic level at 5-min intervals. The period of sustained maximal focus produced significant increases in both tonic accommodation and the accommodative nearpoint in each refractive group. Although the magnitude of change was statistically equivalent across groups, a tendency to greater increases in tonic accommodation was noted for the high myopes. Although the farpoint remained relatively stable in the individual refractive groups, a slight inward shift was found in the combined sample. The tonic change diminished primarily during the first 5 min in darkness, with no significant difference in either the rate or degree of decay in the various refractive groups. The results indicate no clear association between susceptibility to accommodative hysteresis and refractive category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3425675     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198711000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  4 in total

1.  Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Gloria Hentz; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing; Ruth E Manny
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Nearwork-induced transient myopia: a critical review.

Authors:  E Ong; K J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Loreto Martínez-Almeida; Carlos Salas; Carolina Ortíz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.