Literature DB >> 25130066

Study on accommodation by autorefraction and dynamic refraction in children.

Prabhakar Srinivasapur Krishnacharya1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Childhood accommodation interferes with accurate diagnosis of the latent refractive errors. Dynamic retinoscopy offers accurate measurements of accommodative response, while an autorefractometer can predict the accommodative system activation in children. A correlation of the accommodative effort with the dynamic refraction has been investigated in emmetropic children, before and after cycloplegia.
METHODS: A prospective clinical study of accommodative effort in 149 emmetropic children, in the age group 3-16 years, has been conducted using TOPCON AR RM-8000B autorefractor. Dynamic refraction was performed by monocular estimation method before and after cycloplegia, using the retinoscope mirror light as target. Retinoscopic reflex produced 'with the motion' was corrected with positive spherical lenses, and that 'against the motion' was corrected with negative spherical lenses, to achieve neutralization.
RESULTS: Mean accommodative effort measured for 149 children included in the study was -0.63±0.69D and dynamic refraction was -0.07±0.44D before cycloplegia, while the mean was+0.52D after cycloplegia, irrespective of the method used. Autorefractor measured -0.17D of accommodative effort per unit change in dynamic refraction before cycloplegia and +0.90D after cycloplegia.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of TOPCON AR RM-8000B autorefractor was comparable to dynamic retinoscopy. Presence of many children, and in turn, large number of accommodative response data in 11-13 and 14-15 years group is probably linked to prolonged reading/writing. The accuracy and the agreement of the actual accommodative measurements revealed after cycloplegia.
Copyright © 2013 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accommodative effort; Autorefraction; Diopter; Dynamic retinoscopy; auto-refracción; dióptero; esfuerzo acomodativo; retinoscopio dinámico

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130066      PMCID: PMC4213881          DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Optom        ISSN: 1989-1342


  17 in total

1.  Comparing methods of clinical measurement: reporting standards for bland and altman analysis.

Authors:  S Mantha; M F Roizen; L A Fleisher; R Thisted; J Foss
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.

Authors:  W Wesemann; B Dick
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.

Authors:  Alejandro Álvarez León; Sandra Milena Medrano; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Diurnal variations in tonic accommodation.

Authors:  A D Kurtev; B D Stoimenova; M E Georgiev
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.

Authors:  Yee-Fong Choong; Ai-Hong Chen; Pik-Pin Goh
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Gloria Hentz; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing; Ruth E Manny
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  An evaluation of the monocular estimate method of dynamic retinoscopy.

Authors:  M W Rouse; R London; D C Allen
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-03

9.  Clinical evaluation of refraction using a handheld wavefront autorefractor in young and adult patients.

Authors:  Thilo Schimitzek; Wolfgang Wesemann
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  A comparison of manifest refractions, cycloplegic refractions and retinoscopy on the RMA-3000 autorefractometer in children aged 3 to 15 years.

Authors:  T Rotsos; D Grigoriou; A Kokkolaki; N Manios
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Vasoactive intestinal peptide, a promising agent for myopia?

Authors:  Ayse Idil Cakmak; Hikmet Basmak; Huseyin Gursoy; Mete Ozkurt; Nilgun Yildirim; Nilufer Erkasap; Mustafa Deger Bilgec; Nese Tuncel; Ertugrul Colak
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparative Study of Refraction between Wave Front-Based Refraction and Autorefraction without and with Cycloplegia in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Ana M Calvo-Maroto; Sara Llorente-González; Jaione Bezunartea-Bezunartea; Francisco Javier Hurtado-Ceña; Clara Berrozpe-Villabona; Valentina Bilbao-Malavé; David P Piñero; Jesús Barrio-Barrio; Sergio Recalde-Maestre
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.